Laserfiche WebLink
and the subsoil and returned like they were. When Marica has done her inspections, soils have <br />been even pushed off into the pit and the one lift operation is a continuous and ongoing violation, <br />Marcia states that if WFC chooses to modify the IP, a technical revision is required, A PERMIT <br />revision is required. A technical revision can only be used to make minor changes and NO <br />technical revision can be used to make any type of reclamation change to the property. Now, <br />they illegally permitted parts of these properties as dryland. They illegally documented them as <br />pasturelands and now they again are trying to use a technical revision to make another major <br />change to that property that changes it again from how it was- in the beginning prior to mining. <br />That is why PR-06 is under appeal and that is why all of these rules and regulations are being <br />misused and not how or for what they were written. You cannot just flip flop the land and <br />state,well now we want the Western half to be the pastureland and the Eastern half to be the <br />dryland or vice versa. It must be put back to the irrigated cropland and pasturelands that it was <br />prior to mining. It was ALL irrigated prior to mining and done by Gordon and Laurie Smith right <br />up to the time the mine took possession. This is why PR -06 is illegal. You do not have the <br />correct and accurate facts. These facts were given to you by Laurie Smith herself in writting and <br />at the informal hearing that was held here as well as by Mr. Lloyd who told all of you on tape that <br />all of it was always irrigated, and always had been. You have the tape. Listen to it. <br />The environment is -all of these lands, soils and-vegetation. This is our environment and it is . <br />suppose to be protected and they have taken beautiful farmlands and changed them again to <br />dryland, completely against all the laws that were written to protect us from this happening. <br />As to the letter dated May 29 There are many violations when the spoil is being put on top of <br />bench one and the entire Iayers of natural existence are not put back the way they were naturally, <br />all of this is violations. The Eastern portion of the mine East of 27 Road was never done this <br />way, nor was the Johnson property, now WFCs_ We have been trying to make sure other people <br />see what is happening here and they are not likeing what they are seeing. <br />As to San Miguel Power, all documents have been thoroughly searched on your web sight and <br />there was no "right of entry " included in any of your documents as was every other piece of <br />property. This is all part of a permit being approved is it must contain proof of this "right of <br />entry"and be made part of your permanent records for view by the public and it is not because it <br />does not exist. I am requesting a copy of that "Right of Entry" agreement prior to mining. <br />These are all objections and complaints as a result of new postings and letters written that have <br />appeared on the web sight. <br />A new permit should not be issued when the current permit is still and has been violating all <br />rules and regulations. The current permit is not in compliance and until these rules are followed <br />will remain in non - compliance. <br />Thank you for your time. All of these things adversely affect these properties and all of the <br />people here. <br />