My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-05-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2012-05-30_PERMIT FILE - C1981012A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:58:29 PM
Creation date
6/5/2012 10:01:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/30/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring of impacts during mining and previous studies of probable hydrologic consequences <br />(WWL, 1980 and Greystone, 1994) indicate that underground inflows and mine dewatering have little or <br />no communication with surface water. This conclusion is consistent with the subsidence analysis and <br />conceptual model for the New Elk Mine. The maximum extent of subsidence fracturing with increased <br />vertical transmissivity is projected to extend 195 feet above the top of the highest mined coal. The <br />minimum thickness of overburden between the Apache seam and drainage bottoms is 450 feet. A zone of <br />continuous deformation will be present from about 195 feet above the coal to 50 feet below ground <br />surface. No hydrologic impacts or only temporary minor changes in water level are expected to occur in <br />the continuous zone. No flow or water quality impacts are expected to occur to surface water including <br />springs and seep from mining in the Allen and Apache seams. Mine dewatering will draw current water <br />levels down in Allen and Apache seams by 200 or more feet in the permit area. Water level data from <br />packer testing indicate that steep vertical gradients currently exist in the strata adjacent to coal seams. <br />The steep gradients are related to mine dewatering and/or CBM production and suggest that there is <br />limited potential for propagation of drawdown across bedding. Approximately half of the groundwater <br />wells located within a one -mile radius of the permit boundary are completed in alluvium at depths less <br />than 66 feet. No impacts to water level or water quality are expected to occur in alluvial wells. Bedrock <br />wells within the one -mile radius have completion depths varying from 30 to 750 feet bgs. Some of these <br />wells could potentially experience reductions in water levels during mining if they are screened in strata <br />near the Allen or Apache seams. Most of the wells, however, are located outside of the area that will be <br />undermined and are screened several hundred feet above the mined beds. Water quality impacts to the <br />Purgatoire River and the alluvial aquifer from surface operations are expected to be similar to those <br />currently observed from the mine (i.e. an average increase of about 40 mg/l TDS in river water <br />downstream from the mine, and 400 to 500 mg/l TDS increase over background in alluvium down <br />gradient of the RDA). <br />Water Rights. The rights of users of surface and ground water present in the area of the New <br />Elk Mine are reviewed in Section 2.04 of this application. No significant amounts of groundwater were <br />encountered in this area. Therefore, the New Elk Mine's effect on groundwater users is not expected to <br />be significant. Also, projections have been conducted which show insignificant effects on downstream <br />surface water quality and quantity beneficial uses. <br />Water Monitoring Program. A monthly surface and groundwater monitoring program was <br />initiated in February 1984 to gather baseline and operational hydrologic data to assess potential effects of <br />mining. This program was based on stipulations placed on the permit and has been revised multiple times <br />in the interim period. Requirements of the monitoring program are contained in Table 27, Hydrologic <br />Monitoring Requirements and Table 28, Water Quality Parameter Sample Suites. <br />TR -56 2.05 -90a Revised 1/31/11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.