Laserfiche WebLink
Well records from CDWR indicate that there are 19 permitted wells in the Raton Formation within a one <br />mile radius of the permit boundary. The wells vary in depth from 30 to 750 feet, and have completion <br />water levels ranging from 5 to 598 feet bgs. A study by Watts (reference 2006b in exhibit 8(4)) evaluated <br />the potential for groundwater pumping from coal seams in Las Animas county to impact water levels in <br />wells that are used for water supply. He noted that because the permeability of stratified sedimentary <br />rocks generally is greater parallel to bedding than across bedding, the drawdown of water levels in coal <br />seams would have the greatest potential for interfering with nearby water - supply wells in areas where <br />there is little vertical separation between the coal seam and the well production intervals. The analysis <br />assumed that a vertical separation of 100 feet between coal seam and water supply wells would be <br />protective of water supplies, but it was careful to note that the required separation would depend on local <br />geologic conditions. Mining related subsidence will increase vertical permeability for up to 195 feet <br />above the highest mined coal. Wells that produce from 100 feet or higher above the zone of increased <br />vertical permeability are not likely to be adversely impacted by mining. <br />Two bedrock wells are located near the planned mining area in the Allen Seam. The wells are in the <br />northeast half of Section 24, T33E, R68W. Well number 284213 is a monitoring well owned by NECC <br />and is completed in the Allen Seam. The well is 442 feet deep and is designated as NE -1 -10 for the <br />monitoring program. The other bedrock well (permit number 264440) is 200 feet deep and is completed <br />in an unidentified coal bed. The owner of record for the well is Helen Armstrong. Four shallow alluvial <br />wells (12, 13, 14 and PAW -9 on Map 8) are also are also located in northeast half of Section 24, T33E, <br />R68W. Wells 12, 13, and 14 are on land owned by J.I. Vialpando. Well PAW -9 is a monitoring well <br />owned by NECC. Mining of the Allen Seam may have the potential to reduce water levels and impact <br />water quality in the Armstrong well. In the event that water in the well is impacted by mining, the water <br />supply will be replaced with water from the city of Trinidad (city water). Well NE -1 -10 is designed to <br />monitor potential impacts to groundwater in the mining horizon, and impacts to water levels or water <br />quality in the well are not an issue with respect to water supply. Wells 12, 13, 14 and PAW -9 are situated <br />more than 400 feet above the planned mining horizon, and impacts to water quality and availability are <br />not anticipated to these wells. In the event that unanticipated impacts occur the water supply will be <br />replaced with city water as discussed in 2.04.7(3). <br />Based on the previously observed groundwater inflows to the Golden Eagle and New Elk mines, inflow to <br />the New Elk Mine during mining of the Allen and Apache seems is expected to be between 0.04 and 0.1 <br />gpm/acre. Inflow along faults (to the extent that they are present) could modify the range upward. The <br />maximum observed inflow along a fault is 100 gpm at the Golden Eagle Mine. It is likely, however, that <br />mine inflow will be less than predicted based on historical observations because of extensive dewatering <br />of the coal seams related" to CBM production. Mine dewatering has the potential to draw water levels <br />down in Allen and Apache seams by 200 or more feet in the permit area. Water levels in the coal seams <br />are currently depressed by groundwater pumping for CBM production. Mine dewatering will <br />incrementally increase the currently observed drawdown in the Allen and Apache Coal seams. Water <br />level data from packer testing indicate that steep vertical gradients currently exist in the strata adjacent to <br />coal seams. The steep gradients are related to mine dewatering and/or CBM production and suggest that <br />there is limited potential for propagation of drawdown across bedding. No flow or water quality impacts <br />are expected to occur to surface water including springs and seeps due to mine dewatering. <br />TR56 2.05 -58a Revised 4/11 <br />