My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-10-18_REVISION - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1999-10-18_REVISION - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2021 1:28:18 AM
Creation date
6/4/2012 7:10:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/18/1999
Doc Name
Response
From
Sunnyside Gold Corp
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR14
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 1999 Monthly Report <br /> Page 4 <br /> The index number for the August sample is calculated as follows: <br /> Xi = 237 <br /> Xf= 306 <br /> Sf= 104 <br /> Ni = (Xi—Xf) /Sf <br /> Ni = (237— 306) /104 <br /> Ni = -0.66 <br /> The index number graph and updated reporting table are attached. <br /> Evaluation of the normalized data: <br /> The index value of -0.66 for August, 1999 indicates that the dissolved zinc concentration <br /> at the reference point A-72 was significantly lower than the mean value of the reference <br /> data for the high flow class. In comparison to the August 5, 1998 sample result, this <br /> value is lower (237 ug/l verses 290 ug/1). The flows were (584 cfs verses 291 cfs). The <br /> August 5, 1998 sample has a better comparison to the reference data set (-0.76 verses <br /> —0.66) because it is in the intermediate flow class. <br /> Since the results are significantly lower than the reference data set and the immediately <br /> previous years monitoring results, Sunnyside does not plan any additional monitoring. <br /> The 12 period moving average of index values rose to +0.59 from +0.58 even though it <br /> was significantly lower than the reference data set because the result it was replacing was <br /> even lower. While this value is still above the+0.577 benchmark value in the Consent <br /> Decree, it appears that the abnormally high value in May was not part of a continuous <br /> monthly pattern. It will require monitoring results significantly lower than the reference <br /> data, in order for the 12 month average to drop and stay below+0.577 before November <br /> or December. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.