2012-05-31_REVISION - C2009087 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

14. Proposed revised page 2.05 -25 states that As -Built certifications will be developed and provided to the Division upon the completion of haul roads and access roads. No as -built certifications have been provided to the Division and none were included in the TR4 submittal. Please provide appropriate as -built certifications for all constructed haul roads and access roads proposed. a. Haul road have not yet been completed to their final specifications. As- builts for the haul roads will provided as soon as construction is complete. 15. Proposed revised page 2.05 -27 discusses the proposed CDPS permit. Page 2.05 -27 states that upon approval and receipt of the applied for CDPS permit, a copy will be inserted into the PAP in Exhibit 2.05.3 -E3. The Division is aware of the approval of COG - 0048275. Please provide a copy of the CDPS permit for inclusion to the permit and revise page 2.05 -27 to acknowledge the approved permit. a. A copy of the CDPS permit has been included in this response package and page 2.05 -27 has been revised to include the permit. 16. The last paragraph on approved page 2.05 -86 identifies surface disturbance totals of 276 acres. Please revise page 2.05 -86 to the proposed correct acreage amounts in the TR4 application. a. Page 2.05 -86 has been revised to include the correct acreage amounts 17. Approved page 2.05 -87 states that the lower sump has a capacity of 1.3 ac /ft above the principle spillway. Based on the proposed Map 2.05.3 E2E submitted with the TR4 application, the lower sump has a revised capacity above the principle spillway of 1.07 ac /ft. Please revise the text to reflect the revised designs of the Lower Sump proposed in the TR4 application. a. The text has been revised to show the capacity above the principle is 1.07 ac /ft. 18. The proposed revised page 2.05.3- E2.14, Table 2.05.3 -E2 -6 lists design criteria for Grassy Creek Diversion and the new bone yard diversion. These two diversions are not identified on the proposed revised Map 2.05.3 M4. Please revise the proposed Map 2.05.3 M4 to delineate all diversion in which designs are required. a. These diversions do not exist and are not planned. They have been removed from the table. 19. The proposed revised page 2.05.3 -E2.15 states that a minimum of 0.03 feet of freeboard will be utilized in the ditch designs. The correct amount that should be used is 0.3 feet of freeboard. The SEDCAD demonstrations include the 0.3 feet of freeboard. Please revise the text from 0.03 to 0.3 feet of freeboard. a. The text on page 2.05.3 - E2.15 has been revised to reflect the appropriate number of 0.3 feet of freeboard. 20. Proposed revised Table 2.05.3 -E2 -11 on proposed page 2.05.3 -E2.23 lists Culvert 56A as an operational culvert. This culvert was not identified on the revised Map 2.05.3 M4. Please revise Map 2.05.3 M4 to include all culverts which a design is required. a. This culvert does not exist and is not planned. It has been removed from the table.