Laserfiche WebLink
was installed at the bottom and that the well had been intended for a de- watering well but that it was never used <br />for de- watering. That fits the description of SF87 -09 in the drill logs. EFCI does not have any data as to the <br />operating condition of SF87 -09 as to quality, flow, recharge, etc. DRMS requires a letter from the landowner <br />requesting if a monitoring well be converted to a water well or stock water well. The request must be approved, <br />via a Technical Revision, by both the DRMS and the Division of Water. Since EFCI has no water data on SF87 - <br />09, I don't know what the regulators might require. <br />Newlin Creek: I offered the one flow measurement of Newlin Creek at the Mtn Park location (0.8 cfs) to you as a <br />courtesy to the Corley Company. Perhaps you estimated some flow rates for your own use. Given that water <br />flow did not reach EFCI's lower sample point this season, there was no way to compare water samples of the two <br />sites. Regulations require 'both' sites be compared, upper site to lower site, for quality and flow comparisons 'if' <br />there is water flow to do so. <br />George P <br />On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, W D Corley, Jr. < aiicQatt.net > wrote: <br />George, <br />I have contacted the Division of Water Resources which has given me some information regarding conversion of your <br />exploration drill holes to water wells. While no formal decision has been rendered it would appear that DWR Well <br />Construction Rules would prohibit permitting of SF87 -07 because of the lack of a steel surface casing. SF87 -09, <br />however, may be allowed permitting. What are your plans to convert SF87 -07 to a monitoring well? What are your <br />suggestions for locating all of the exploration drill holes that were not permanently marked? How can we locate the drill <br />hole that you said that Al Weaver said was probably still open in a Rex Carbon pillar (since there are two Rex Carbon <br />mines, one on Cribbs /Jackson and one on Corley)? <br />We received a copy of the DRMS May 15th inspection report which mentions that Rich Munson was going to meet with uE <br />the week ending May 18th. Since we were not asked to meet that week or the week ending May 25th, is there still to be a <br />meeting? What are your plans to mitigate the subsidence? <br />We have continued to monitor Newlin Creek flow at irregular intervals. My last observation was on May 20th when there <br />was still flow at the Thompson culvert. There still is no sign of flow at the center of section 19. What would be your <br />estimate of the total flow this year of the water leaving the Mountain Park? <br />Doug Corley <br />