My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-04-21_REVISION - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2012-04-21_REVISION - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:56:34 PM
Creation date
5/30/2012 10:44:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/21/2012
Doc Name
Subsurface Exploration Program, Geotechnical Recommendations, Slope Evaluation and Remediation
From
Kathy Welt
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR128
Email Name
JRS
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Slope Evaluation and Remediation <br />West Elk Mine <br />Somerset, Colorado <br />dry to moist and low to high plasticity. These materials were derived from the <br />Cretaceous -aged Mesaverde Formation. <br />Groundwater was not encountered in the test holes at the time of the subsurface <br />exploration program but were measured in Test Hole 4 and 5 at depths of 20 (TH 4) and <br />24 (TH 5) feet below existing grades the following day. Groundwater was also measured <br />by a representative of the Client on September 16 (10 days later), at depths of 16 (TH 4) <br />and 23 (TH 5) feet below existing grades. However, based on our experience with <br />similar projects, groundwater levels should also be expected to fluctuate, and likely rise, <br />in response to annual and longer -term cycles of precipitation, irrigation, snow melt, <br />surface drainage, land use, and the development of transient, perched water conditions. <br />SLOPE EVALUATION <br />The existing gully (drainage channel) and associated slopes descending from the coal <br />stockpile and access road reportedly has been marginally stable for a number of years. <br />Additional fill material apparently has been added periodically to maintain grades along <br />the access road but particularly within the old drainage channel (gully). The rate of <br />movement of this local area has been significantly faster (i.e. feet per year) compared to <br />that of the much larger landslide that underlies much of the mine. We understand that <br />the older and larger landslide complex is currently moving at a rate of about 1 inch per <br />year. The interpreted limits of the subject landslide are shown on Figure 1 <br />Again, we understand that a gentle gully (drainage channel) previously descended along <br />roughly the centerline of the recent landslide. In addition, a coarse rock fill previously <br />had been placed in the Swale. <br />It is not readily apparent to what degree conventional densification of the previously <br />placed fill has contributed to the recurrent movements of the recent landslide feature in <br />this location. GROUND has assumed (conservatively) that movement has been the <br />result entirely of landslide -type movement within the recent landslide feature and <br />distinctly different (i.e. rate, magnitude, suspected cause, impact, etc.) from the larger <br />landslide complex. <br />SlopeW Modeling Stability modeling of the subject landslide was performed using the <br />SlopeW computer program along the geologic section line A — A'. Using estimated <br />values for the material properties of the geologic units based on the field and laboratory <br />Job No. 11 -6014 GROUND Engineering Consultants, Inc. Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.