My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (226)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (226)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 4:22:58 AM
Creation date
5/24/2012 9:39:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Replies to Adequacy Review Comments on Vegetation Information
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter III Appendix III-H-3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WESTERN <br /> RESOURCE <br /> DEVELOPMENT <br /> CORP. <br /> P.O. Box 467 <br /> 711 Walnut Street-Suite 200 <br /> Boulder, Colorado 8M <br /> (303)449-9009 <br /> July 2, 1981 <br /> Mr. Doug Bowman <br /> Mid—Continent Resources <br /> Box .158 <br /> Carbondale, CO 81623 <br /> Re: Confidence Levels and Vegetation Type Acreages <br /> Dear Doug: <br /> Enclosed you will find a table presenting: (1) a calculated t—value, <br /> (2) the corresponding confidence level (two—tailed) for that t—value, <br /> and (3) a calculated D—value (the % reduction detectable with 80% <br /> confidence) . These figures are given for cover and production means <br /> of all affected and corresponding reference areas. One—tailed confi— <br /> dence levels are also given for production values because we still <br /> maintain this is the appropriate statistical procedure. <br /> As you can see, there are no problems with the cover values as they <br /> _ meet all criteria of the CMLR. This is not true, however, of the <br /> production values. None of the confidence limits are within acceptable <br /> standards ( two—tailed) although three are acceptable (one—tailed <80%) <br /> and two are very close (<75%) . In all cases for these data, confidence <br /> levels should-be- greater than or equal to 80i; while D—values should be <br /> less than or equal to 10%. <br /> Our sample sizes are accordingly too small for the production data. <br /> This is, as you know, the result of an error in a published OSM version <br /> of the sample adequacy formula and past assurances that we could in <br /> fact use a one—tailed t—test (a decision subsequently reversed) . <br /> The acreages of the affected vegetation types are: Aspen Woodland <br /> 83.5 acres, Aspen Shrubland 16.6 acres, Spruce—fir Parkland 36.8 acres, <br /> Spruce—fir Forest 4.2 acres, Oak Shrubland 2.6 acres, and Riparian <br /> Woodland 2.0 acres. The total affected acreage is 145.7. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.