Laserfiche WebLink
It is the States job to make sure that WFC does their job, it is not up to us to have to file a written <br />citizens complaint to have them be in compliance, and we are not going to file a citizens <br />complaint. We are going to provide you with the facts and Z will be sending a hard copy of those <br />facts and rules and regulations and the State needs to make sure that these permits are in <br />compliance because right now, they are not. <br />We do not feel that another permit should be issued to them when they have not and are not <br />doing this correctly. The figures that Marcia keep stating is man made measurements and <br />Morgans have up to 55 feet thick of nice bench one and when our alfalfa roots and corn roots <br />have been documented as being down 25 feet by ALL of you, it seems pretty awkward that a <br />statement would be made that this isn't going to hurt the landowner. This black junk that has <br />nothing of value and- has nothing but rocks -and high. iron content and salt content that a statement <br />can even be made that it is not harmful and will not be detrimental to us. <br />And for Marcia to write that DBMS does not need a lease to enter the property. There are 9 laws <br />governing "right of Entry" prior to mining and these must be a part of the permit application in <br />order to even get a permit approved. And when there was NO right of Entry in all of your <br />records or recorded anywhere, that is a non- compliance issue and another permit renewal that <br />should not have been approved in the first place uutil all information was, correct, accurate., and <br />in order and it was not.. It is sad when we are depending on people to protect the landowner and <br />statements like that are made and the rules and regulations and the Act are again ignored and <br />misused. How does the State require bond release and require it to be released from the State <br />when it did not have a right of Entry to-begin with? ?(This. was included in Marcias report that <br />had nothing to do with what we asked), so T did some of my own research. <br />'We are objecting to New Horizon North until we can have our own put back in accordance with <br />the laws governing surface coal mining. <br />Thank you for your time <br />