Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> 2 <br /> The Federal Bureau of Mines has been conducting research on the utiliza- <br /> tion and stabilization of mineral wastes for many years (2, 4).3 The fine <br /> wastes represent the most difficult materials to stabilize. Many mining and <br /> milling companies have worked independently for many years and, during the <br /> past few years , cooperatively with the Bureau in evaluating various stabiliza- <br /> tion methods in the field. A free exchange of information has taken place. <br /> This paper reviews the various methods and presents cost estimates for stabi- <br /> lizing fine-sized milling wastes. Preliminary results of ongoing research by <br /> the Bureau of Mines for lowering maintenance costs and stabilizing special <br /> problem areas are reported. <br /> STABILIZATION PROCEDURES <br /> The principal methods for stabilization of milling was <br /> tes include the <br /> following: <br /> �f <br /> 1. Physical--the covering of the tailings with soil or other restraining <br /> materials. <br /> 2. Chemical--the use of a material to interact with fine-sized minerals <br /> to form a crust. <br /> i <br /> 3. Vegetative--the growth of plants in the tailings. <br /> i. The vegetative procedure is preferred in that esthetics of the area are <br /> improved while obtaining stabilization. Also, if a mineralized waste is to be <br /> j conserved for possible later retreatment or if the area is to be used later <br /> for residential construction or recreational purposes, it is beneficial to <br /> stabilize the area with vegetation. Vegetation does not hinder retreatment as <br /> much as covering the tailings with other foreign materials. <br /> Physical Stabilization <br /> Many materials have been tried for physical stabilization of fine tail- <br /> ings to prevent air pollution. Other than water for sprinkling, perhaps the <br /> most used material is rock and soil obtained from nearby areas. The use of <br /> soil often offers the advantage of effective cover while providing a habitat <br /> for local vegetation. Crushed or granulated smelter slag often has been used <br /> to stabilize a variety of fine wastes , notably inactive tailings ponds. On <br /> active tailings ponds, however, the slag-covered portions are subject to <br /> burial by shifting and newly deposited sands. Slag has the drawback, unlike <br /> �. soils or country rock, of not providing a favorable habitat for vegetation. <br /> y Other physical methods of stabilization evaluated include the use of bark <br /> " x covering, and the harrowing of straw into the top few inches of tailings to <br /> serve as a windbreak. <br /> Underlined numbers in parentheses refer to items in the list of references at <br /> the end of this report. <br />