Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Candace Thompson <br /> Page 2 <br /> July 20, 1987 <br /> 16 Area is the top of the pile between both ridges, it <br /> is just about flat with a slight slope to the north <br /> and a portion to the west. We would replace all <br /> topsoil removed 5 1/2" avg. Note: it has been our <br /> experience on the Sutey property to recover more <br /> topsoil then surveyed as the terrain has deep pockets <br /> of topsoil ran down spaced across the valley. i. e. <br /> last week 7/9/87 the cat operator was removing 5 ' of <br /> topsoil from an area that was suppose to have 22" . 5 <br /> 1/2" of topsoil on a flat top of a refuse pile is more <br /> than enough to sustain growth. See Tom Colbert VEG <br /> Study on the old refuse pile. (Vol. 6, App 111-H-4) <br /> 3 . No topsoil will be salvaged when snow is on the <br /> ground. The vegetation reference area will have posts <br /> placed at 100 ' intervals and a 25' buffer zone <br /> established to project the area. <br /> 4 . Phase I Pond Reclamation Costs - One pond approximately <br /> 145' x 200' = 29 ,000 sq. ft. 0 . 67 acre. Distrubed area. <br /> The culverts , overflow pipes and other man made <br /> structures can be dug out and loaded in a dump truck <br /> in a maximum of 8 hours. <br /> 214 B ackhoe - $58 Per Hr. x 8 = $464 . <br /> 966 Loader - $68 Per Hr. x 2 = $126 . <br /> Dump Truck 44D - $44 Per Hr x 2 = $ 88 . - <br /> $688 <br /> Backfilling of one pond will be accomplished with a <br /> D-8 dozer for an average push distance of 100 feet. A <br /> D-8 dozer can push 900 cubic yards per hour at this <br /> distance. <br /> 6500 . cu.yd. divided by 900 = 7.2 hrs. <br /> @ 118/hr = $849.60 <br /> Topsoling = 29 , 000 sq. ft. x . 88 (Area #5) = 25 , 520 <br /> divided by 27 = 945 . cu yds divided by 120 = 7.9 hrs. <br /> Note: 966 loader $68 x 8 hrs. _ $544 . 00 <br /> Short haul, topsoil pile close to pond Total $2082. 00 <br /> Phase I - Pond Reclamation Bond $2,082. 00 <br /> MLRD Indirect Costs 20% = 416.40 <br /> (What was the Board decision on $3498 .40 <br /> percentage of indirect costs) <br /> 91 <br />