My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (103)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1987-12-01_PERMIT FILE - C1981017 (103)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 1:17:45 AM
Creation date
5/15/2012 9:22:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
12/1/1987
Doc Name
Rock Tunnel Project
Section_Exhibit Name
Chapter II Appendix II-B-3 (Part 1 of 2)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. 2 ROCK TUNNEL DISPOSAL FACILITY <br /> ' An investigation similar to that at the coal refuse disposal <br /> facility was performed at the site of the rock tunnel waste <br /> disposal . The facility was visually inspected and a series of <br /> compaction tests performed at the site on the same day. <br /> The visual inspection confirms that the material of the dis- <br /> posal facility has the character of a fairly good quality <br /> rockfill. It consists mostly of gravel and larger size fragments <br /> of Mancos Shale, with a very limited amount of fine fraction. It <br /> is also evident that the fill has been built according to the <br /> specification, i . e. the material was hauled to the site with <br /> trucks and then spread in horizontal layers and compacted by <br /> - transporting equipment. Central portions of the facility have a <br /> very good appearance and no signs of either stability or settle- <br /> ment problems. <br /> The side slopes of the facility, however, carry frequent <br /> signs of sliding , sloughing, or mudflows. According to the in- <br /> formation obtained at the site, these surficial stability prob- <br /> lems were caused by accidental removal of the uppermost waste <br /> pile layer by dozers and by dumping this material over the crest. <br /> Because of the probable presence of snow, the surface material <br /> was close to saturated, and when pushed over the crest, it <br /> created the surficial stability problems. <br /> The compaction of the rock tunnel waste was verified by a <br /> total of nine in situ tests. As in the previous case , two tests <br /> were performed by the sand cone method , and the remaining tests <br /> were carried out with the nuclear density device. Unlike at the <br /> coal refuse disposal facility, the nuclear density device tests <br /> provided apparently satisfactory results as no organic matter was <br /> present within the waste -pile. <br /> The results are presented in the Appendix of the report. The <br /> laboratory moisture and density relationship on the same material <br /> was performed and is also presented in the Appendix. Maximum dry <br /> densities of 134.5 and 135.9 pcf were determined. The results of <br /> the compaction testing indicate that compaction on the order of <br /> 90 % or slightly less was achieved in most cases. An exception- <br /> ally low compaction of 68 to 69 % was found at locations where a <br /> locally increased moisture content was observed. Such locations <br /> probably correspond to locations were snow was mixed with the <br /> waste. <br /> The results of Lincoln DeVore and recent testings show that <br /> the maximum densities estimated in 1979 and at present coincide <br /> very closely. While maximum densities of 131.2 pcf were obtained <br /> by Lincoln DeVore , only slightly higher densities of 134.5 to <br /> 135.9 pcf were estimated at present. For this reason, it appears <br /> that the results of Lincoln DeVore triaxial testing, performed on <br /> lg <br /> NCAlM1s/�ffUlHunui± wr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.