My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-05-10_REPORT - C1981041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2012-05-10_REPORT - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:57:31 PM
Creation date
5/14/2012 9:35:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
5/10/2012
Doc Name
2011 Annual Reclamation Report
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2 Determination of Ground Cover <br />Ground cover at each sample point was determined utilizing the point- intercept methodology as <br />illustrated on Figure 1. As indicated in this figure, Cedar Creek utilizes state -of- the -art instrumentation it <br />has pioneered to facilitate much more rapid and accurate collection of data. A transect of 10 meters <br />length was extended in the direction of the next sampling location of each systematically located sample <br />point. At each one -meter interval along the cover transect, a "laser point bar" was situated parallel to, <br />and approximately 4.5 feet vertically above the ground surface. A set of 10 readings was recorded as to <br />hits on vegetation (by species), litter, rock ( >2mm), or bare soil. Hits were determined at each meter <br />interval by activating a battery of 10 low- energy specialized lasers situated along the bar at 10 centimeter <br />intervals and recording the variable intercepted by each of the vertically projected narrow (0.5mm) <br />focused beams (Figure 1). In this manner, a total of 100 intercepts per transect were recorded resulting <br />in 1 percent cover per intercept. (Second hits on understory vegetation were not collected owing to the <br />managerial nature of collected data.) All reclaimed area vegetation as well as reference area vegetation <br />(including both herbaceous and shrub strata) were subject to sampling. This methodology and <br />instrumentation facilitates the collection of the most unbiased, repeatable, and precise ground cover data <br />possible. <br />2.3 Determination of Current Annual Production <br />At 30 sample sites in each reference area and 10 sample sites in each revegetation area, current <br />annual herbaceous production was collected from a 0.5 m quadrat frame placed one meter and 90° to <br />the right (clockwise) of the ground cover transect to facilitate avoidance of vegetation trampled by <br />investigators during sample site location (Figure 1). From within each quadrat, all above ground current <br />annual vegetation within the vertical boundaries of the frame was clipped and bagged separately by life <br />form as follows: <br />Perennial Grasses Perennial Forbs <br />Annual Grasses Annual & Biennial Forbs <br />Sub - Shrubs Noxious Weeds <br />All production samples were returned to the lab for drying and weighing. Drying occurred at 105° C <br />until a stable weight was achieved (at least 24 hours). Samples were then weighed to the nearest 0.1 <br />gram. Total weights for each sample site were compiled and converted to pounds per acre prior to <br />success comparison. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. <br />Page 11 Snowcap - Revegetation Evaluation - 2011 <br />Monitoring <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.