Laserfiche WebLink
Hernandez, Alysha <br />From: Binns, Janet <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 1:22 PM <br />To: DRMS - Coal -Admin <br />Cc: Gorham, Kent <br />Subject: Southfield Mine C1981014 <br />Please scan this e -mail: <br />Southfield Mine <br />C1981014 <br />General Docs <br />Energy Fuels response to well NWMW <br />Thank you <br />Janet <br />From: George Patterson [ mailto:efcoal(a)gmail.com ] <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 12:07 PM <br />To: Gorham, Kent <br />Cc: Binns, Janet <br />Subject: Southfield monitor well "NWMW" <br />Kent, <br />Given that Corley's concerns about water continue, this is to confirm my phone conversation with you this past <br />Friday. <br />On Friday, May 4, 2012 I probed Southfield's monitor well, NWMW with the water detection probe. No water <br />was detected. Based on your Inspection Report of NWMW, wherein you detected a suspected pocket of water at <br />the 354 ft level assumed remaining from the 1500 gallons of water we had just poured into the casing, I probed <br />that level several times. I raised and lowered the probe from 350 ft to 360 ft numerous times. No signal from the <br />probe was received. When I retreived the probe from the well, the probe was dry and no mud was on the <br />probe. Also, when retrieved, the probe line was straight with no kinks or coils, indictating the probe had <br />reached the indicated depth, 360 ft. Apparently the water detected at the 354 ft level during the inspection <br />has dissipated as we had expected it might. <br />I maintain that NWMW monitoring well is dry and functioning as intended to monitor Southfield potential mine <br />water. <br />George V Patterson <br />Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. <br />