Laserfiche WebLink
KEN SALAZAR <br />Attorney General <br />BARBARA MCDONNELL <br />Chief Deputy Attorney General <br />MICHAEL E. MCLACHLAN <br />Solicitor General <br />Geoffrey Anderson <br />Plaza Tower, Suite 1030 <br />6400 Fiddlers Green Circle <br />Englewood, CO 80111 <br />Dear Geoffrey: <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DEPARTMENT OF LAW <br />OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL <br />April 5, 1999 <br />STATE SERVICES BUILDING <br />1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone (303) 866 -4500 <br />FAX (303) 866 -5691 <br />RE: BOCC of Pitkin County. et al v. Mid - Continent Resources, Inc., et al v. Division of <br />Minerals and Geology (97CV131 -3) <br />You have requested to depose Division employee Steve Renner on April 9, 1999. You have <br />also requested further responses to your discovery request in your letter of April 1, 1999. In <br />light of the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Division concerning Mid - Continent Resources and <br />the Creditors' Trustee's amended complaint, by statute, all discovery must be suspended. <br />The Division's Motion to Dismiss raises issues of governmental immunity. The Colorado <br />Governmental Immunity Act provides that: "If a public entity raises the issue of sovereign <br />immunity prior to or after commencement of discovery, the Court shall suspend discovery, <br />except any discovery necessary to decide the issue of sovereign immunity, and shall decide <br />such issue on motion." § 24 -10 -108, C.R.S. (emphasis added). <br />The clear and mandatory language of the statute requires that all discovery cease upon a <br />public entity raising issues of sovereign immunity, except for discovery necessary to decide <br />the issue of sovereign immunity. Since Mr. Renner would not have information necessary to <br />decide the issue of sovereign immunity and since your letter of April 1, 1999, requesting <br />further discovery does not go to the issue of sovereign immunity, I am denying your request <br />to depose Mr. Renner and your request for further discovery until the Court rules on the <br />issues of sovereign immunity. Should you disagree about what the statute requires, the <br />Division will file a motion for protective order to allow the Court to decide the issue. <br />