My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-03-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1999-03-10_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2021 12:46:59 PM
Creation date
5/3/2012 9:34:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
3/10/1999
Doc Name
Order Granting Morion to Strike
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As described in previous orders, this case arose after Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. stopped <br /> mining operations in Coal Basin, Pitkin, Colorado, in 1991 and then filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy <br /> proceeding in February 1992. <br /> In the Amended Third-party Complaint, the Movants raise several issues objecting to how <br /> Third-party Defendant State of Colorado, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals and <br /> Geology ("DMG'), has performed in implementing the reclamation plan, which was part of a <br /> Bankruptcy Plan approved in April 1994. Movants, among other things, seek a detailed statement of <br /> what DMG has spent for reclamation at the subject property and how much it plans to spend.The first <br /> claim for relief in the Amended Third-party Complaint focuses on the financial aspects of the <br /> reclamation of Coal Basin after the cessation of mining. The second' claim for relief attacks <br /> DMG's expenditure of bankruptcy money for steep slope revegetation. The issue raised is whether the <br /> reclamation plan approved by the bankruptcy court required so steep a slope revegetation and whether <br /> the DMG techniques were beneficial or were a waste of bankruptcy money. The third claim for relief <br /> sounds in breach of contract The Movants allege that DMG has not complied with the reclamation <br /> plan and is squandering bankruptcy funds. The fourth claim for relief is for breach of a duty of good <br /> faith and fair dealing, claiming that DMG has not followed the bankruptcy plan and has not complied <br /> with its own rules and regulations concerning reclamation. <br /> The parties agree that the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act("Coal Act'D applies to <br /> the Coal Basin reclamation efforts, C.R.S. 34-33-101, et seq. They also agree that DMG regulations <br /> under the Coal Act cover reclamation. Section 4.15 deals with the mechanics of revegetating land that <br /> has been used for coal mining,and Section 4.27 addresses operations on steep slopes. <br /> The Coal Act governs the reclamation at Coal Basin. The issue is whether the Coal Act <br /> preempts the BOCC's answers to the first four claims for relief. The Local Govemment Land Use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.