Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the information present d ' n the conference, I cone <br /> the NOV should be vacated. <br /> reclaiming the mine site. I bel " ve MCR is contemporaneously <br /> be realistically adjusted to refieC the current o poraneously <br /> he reclamation schedule should <br /> conditions. Operating <br /> NOV C-9�0 <br /> NOV C-93-130 was issued for <br /> "Failurbest technology currently available, so as to ntolminimosion, using <br /> disturbance to the Prevailingminimize <br /> vegetation" . hydrologic balance, topsoil and <br /> Larry Routten issued the NOV on September 20, 1993 <br /> from the office. He explained that the NOV is directed at <br /> outslopes of portal benches at Mine 1, 2, 3 and 4. the <br /> Historically, they have been considered as <br /> Pre-law <br /> However, the Division is contending that they have beenes. <br /> reaffected resulting from snow removal operations, trash dumping <br /> and discharge from small area exemptions on the 12 and 14 <br /> benches. p g <br /> MCR contested the NOV. They said a snow removal plan strict <br /> forbid snow from being deposited over the outslo 1 <br /> claimed no trash was thrown over the side slopes and the we y <br /> PeS• They <br /> unaware of discharge from the S h Y re <br /> the material from they are built are naturallyeerosive.are MCR, but <br /> always taken every effort to avoid disturbing the outslopesR has <br /> because they are considered pre-law. <br /> Z asked to see what type Division had no picture of erosion had Occurred, but the <br /> recommend that the s or other evidence of a violation. I <br /> NOV be vacated for lack of evidence. <br /> I should note that MCR has submitted a plan to control erosion on <br /> the outslopes during the reciamatiori of the benches_ <br /> Attachments <br /> cc: Steve Renner <br /> Tony Waldron <br /> Larry Routten <br />