Laserfiche WebLink
13, 1998. The Court also stated that the Division was to file its response within the <br /> deadlines set by the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. <br /> 2. The Division received the Third Party Plaintiffs' motion to amend on <br /> August 13. The claims for relief and the issues raised in the amended complaint are <br /> substantially different from those asserted in the current Third-Party Complaint. The <br /> Division will file an objection to the motion to amend. Under the rules, the Division <br /> has until August 31 to file its objection to the motion. Seg.C.R.C.P. 121-15. See <br /> C.R.C.P. 6(e) (granting three days in addition to the 15 days allowed under the rules <br /> to respond to motion if served by mail). <br /> 3. Also at the August 3 status conference, the Court set another status <br /> conference to be held August 28 for the purposes of setting this matter for trial and <br /> issuing a new case management order. The Court ordered the parties to submit a <br /> proposed case management order by August 27, 1998, if the proposed order is <br /> disputed, or by August 28 if the order is not disputed. The Court ordered the Third- <br /> Party Plaintiffs to prepare the proposed order. As of the time of the filing of this <br /> motion,undersigned counsel has not received a proposed order from counsel for the <br /> Third-Party Plaintiffs. <br /> 4. In the interests of judicial economy, issuing a proposed case management <br /> order should be deferred until after this Court has ruled on the motion to amend the <br /> third-party complaint. If the Court denies the motion, then the parties can propose an <br />