My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-04-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1999-04-16_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2021 12:37:54 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:23:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/16/1999
Doc Name
Request for settlement statement
From
Attorney General
To
Dispute Management, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
allotted to reclamation given the limited nature of the funds . The <br /> Trustee simply has not provided documentation which establishes <br /> that the $382, 000 was for reclamation work done prior to the <br /> effective date of the liquidation plan and done pursuant, to cash <br /> collateral orders . <br /> There is a long history concerning Coal Basin reclamation work <br /> and the cost or credit thereof, for work done by entities other <br /> than the Division. Machinery and Equipment was authorized by the <br /> bankruptcy court to perform demolition work. In addition, Pitkin <br /> Iron also performed certain reclamation tasks . Pitkin Iron and MCR <br /> have common directors and officers; Robert Delaney is a principal <br /> of that corporation as well as MCR and the LLC. Exhibit 2 . <br /> In MCR' s bankruptcy proceedings, the Court issued three cash <br /> collateral orders in 1993 . Pitkin Iron was paid pursuant to these <br /> three orders at least $600, 000 for reclamation work it performed. <br /> Exhibit 10 . In addition, after the liquidation plan was confirmed, <br /> Pitkin Iron requested payment of an additional $200, 000 from the <br /> bankruptcy court out of estate money for work it purportedly <br /> performed. Exhibit 11 . The Division objected. Exhibit 12 . <br /> Ultimately, the matter was settled and Pitkin Iron received <br /> $180 , 000 of the $200, 000 . Exhibit 13 . The settlement agreement <br /> specified that the $180 , 000 would not be taken against reclamation <br /> funds . See also Exhibit 14 , Trustee' s affidavit, in which he <br /> states Pitkin Iron' s claim will not be taken against reclamation <br /> funds . <br /> Thus, payments of over $780, 000 have already been made for <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.