My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-09-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-09-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:03:51 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:23:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
9/21/1998
Doc Name
Fax, amended 3rd party complaint & certificate of services
From
Burns, Figa & Will, P.C.
To
Cheryl Linden
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09/21/98 14:44 FAX 3037962777 BUR\S FIGA & WILL 1jn 008/012 <br /> C: 1 <br /> 1. <br /> 25. Defendants have requested DMG account for Creditors' Trust funds provided it, l <br /> state the amount of Creditors' Trust monies on hand, and state what Creditors' Trust funded <br /> reclamation work, if any, remains to be done in Coal Basin. DMG has provided information in <br /> response to Defendants' request for an accounting, but the information lacks sufficient detail for : <br /> Defendants to determine the true status of funding and reclamation. ` <br /> r <br /> 26. The Bankruptcy Liquidation Plan-mandates development of a Reclamation Plan <br /> schedule to be negotiated among the "Debtor [MCR], the DMG, and the MLRB." (Plan § 4.3.4.) <br /> Despite repeated requests on behalf of NICR, DMG has neglected and refused to negotiate a <br /> schedule" to achieve "completion of principal reclamation activity at the Mine Site prior to <br /> December 1. 1996"as required by the Bankruptcy Liquidation Plan, id. ; <br /> SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF <br /> (Breach of Contract Steep Slope Vegetation) F <br /> 27. MCR and the Creditors' Trustee hereby incorporate all previous averments as if set <br /> forth in full. <br /> 28. DMG's mine reclamation activity in Coal Basin and near Carbondale, Colorado, is t <br /> expressly subject to the provisions of the Liquidation Plan which incorporates the Reclamation i <br /> Plan. L <br /> u. <br /> 29. In carrying out the reclamation activities under the Reclamation Plan, DMG is �. <br /> acting pursuant to a contract entered into by, among others,DMG, MCR and MCR's creditors who r <br /> are all parties to and bound by the Liquidation Plan,which was approved by the Bankruptcy Court. <br /> i <br /> 30. As part of its reclamation activity, DMG has spent and has proposed spending <br /> t <br /> substantial sums from the reclamation fund for steep slope re-vegetation. <br /> 31. The Reclamation Plan no where calls for, allows or authorizes such steep slope re- <br /> k <br /> vegetation efforts as have been carried out and are contemplated by DMG. The DMG spent at least t; <br /> $72,260.00 in 1997 for steep slope re-vegetation-and has recently taken bids for additional steep F <br /> slope re-vegetation to be performed in 1998. <br /> 32. The steep slope re-vegetation is experimental and the 1997 steep slope re- <br /> vegetation has been a failure. <br /> 33, By expending reclamation fiords on steep slope re-vegetation,DMG has breached <br /> the contract it entered into as part of the Bankruptcy Liquidation Plan. r <br /> 34. MCR and the Creditors' Trustee have been damaged by the actions of DMG <br /> because less money will be available for payment of residual claims pursuant to Plan Section 4.3.5. <br /> The amount of damages will be proven at trial. I' <br /> i� <br /> AMENDED <br /> -6- <br /> TH1RD-PARTY CoNrnLArNc <br /> CtvtLNo.97 cv 131-3 �. <br /> F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.