My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-09-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-09-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 8:14:30 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:23:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
9/30/1998
Doc Name
Answer to amended 3rd party complaint
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. The Division admits that, in conjunction with the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br /> it administers the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act and states that the Act <br /> speaks for itself. <br /> ORIGINAL ACTION <br /> 4. The Division admits that the Plaintiffs commenced this action and states that the <br /> Plaintiffs' complaint speaks for itself. <br /> 5. The Division admits that MCR and Louis LaGiglia have responded to the <br /> Plaintiffs' complaint and states that their Amended Answer and Counterclaims speaks for <br /> itself. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> 6. The Division is without sufficient information and knowledge regarding the truth <br /> or accuracy of the allegations of paragraph 6 and therefore denies the same, except the <br /> Division admits that MCR operated an underground coal mine in Coal Basin. <br /> 7. The Division is without sufficient information and knowledge regarding the truth <br /> or accuracy of the allegations contained in paragraph 7 and therefore denies the same. <br /> 8. The Division admits the allegations of paragraph 8. <br /> MCR BANKRUPTCY FILING <br /> 9 and 10. The Division admits that MCR filed a petition in bankruptcy on February <br /> 12, 1992, and that the Division was a creditor and a party in interest in the bankruptcy <br /> proceeding, and states that the petition speaks for itself. <br /> M&E/KING CONTRACT <br /> 11. The Division admits that MCR petitioned the bankruptcy court for authority to <br /> employ Machinery and Equipment Co., Inc., and states that the motion speaks for itself. <br /> 12. The Division admits that the motion to employ M&E was supplemented by a <br /> subsequent motion and, as to the rest of the allegations in paragraph 12. states that it is <br /> without sufficient information and knowledge regarding the truth or accuracy of the <br /> allegations and therefore denies the same. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.