My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-12-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1998-12-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2021 4:39:45 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 2:23:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/21/1998
Doc Name
Objection to motion to intervene and in the alternative motion to strike
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. & DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Should the Court grant the LLC's motion to intervene, the Division requests that the <br /> Court strike the additional claims and arguments that the LLC attempts to interject into the <br /> lawsuit through its motion. It is the duty of this court to respect the integrity of issues raised <br /> in the pleadings between the original parties and to prevent injection of new issues by <br /> intervention. Moreno v. Commercial Security Bank, 125 Colo. 11, 240 P.2d 118 (1952). <br /> Here, the LLC is not taking the suit as it found it but seeks to inject new claims and issues <br /> into the suit. This Court should exercise its discretion to strike or refuse to hear matters <br /> presented by the intervenor. See Roosevelt v. Beau Monde Co., 152 Colo. 567, 384 P.2d 96 <br /> (1963). <br /> Specifically, the Division requests the Court to strike paragraphs 31, 32, 33 of the first <br /> claim of relief; the entire second claim for relief(paragraphs 35 through 40); and the entire <br /> third claim for relief(paragraphs 41-48). By these paragraphs, the LLC attempts to inject <br /> new issues and ci ims for relief into this case. This court should not allow the LLC's <br /> attempt but should respect the integrity of the issues raised in the current amended third-party <br /> complaint. Roosevelt, supra; Moreno. supra. <br /> GALE A.NORTON <br /> Attorney General <br /> RICHARD A. WESTFALL <br /> Solicitor General <br /> the mine site. See C.R.C.P. 19 (a) (2) (B) . However, this Court can join the <br /> LLC under Rule 19 and still deny the LLC's motion to intervene since Rule 19 <br /> and 24 set forth different standards to meet. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.