My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-07-31_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1997-07-31_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2021 9:49:01 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 12:49:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/31/1997
Doc Name
Civil Action No. 97-CV-131 Plaintiff Reply to Defendants Amended Answer and Counterclaim
From
District Court County of Pitkin
To
Mid-Continent Resources Inc
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISTRICT COURT. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO <br /> Civil Action No. 97-CV-131 <br /> PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' AMENDED ANSWER AND <br /> COUNTERCLAIM <br /> BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO <br /> and THOMAS CARL OKEN. PITKIN COUNTY TREASURER, <br /> Plaintiffs, <br /> v. <br /> NIID-CONTINENT RESOURCES. INC.. and LOUIS LaGIGLIA, CREDITORS' <br /> TRUSTEE UNDER BANKRUPTCY PLAN OF LIQUIDATION, <br /> Defendants. <br /> Plaintiffs, by undersigned counsel. reply to Defendants' Amended Answer and <br /> Counterclaims as follows: <br /> 1. With respect to Defendants' Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses. <br /> Plaintiffs state the Defendants have failed to Mate anv legal defense to Plaintiffs' claims. <br /> I. <br /> Plaintiffs further state that except as stated in paragraph 1, Plaintiffs file no <br /> responsive pleading with respect to Defendants' Amended Answer and Affirmative <br /> Defenses. and all averments contained in Defendants' Amended Answer and averments. <br /> except to the extent admitted in responses to Defendants' Counterclaims, are denied. <br /> 3. Plaintiffs are without lino«iedge as to the status of Mid-Continent <br /> Resources. Inc. ("MCR") as a Delaware comoration. and as except so stated, admit the <br /> averments of paragraph 49 of Defendants' Amended General Allegations. <br /> 4. The Plaintiffs are without knowledge or information sufficient to form a <br /> belief as to the truth of the averments in paragraph 50. except that Plaintiffs admit that <br /> MICR operated a coal mine in Coal Basin. and that a -Mine Site" is defined in the <br /> %1 & E/King Contract. <br /> 5. Plaintiffs are without kno«ledge or information sufficient to form a belief <br /> as to the truth of the averments in paragraphs 51 through 54. <br /> rJUL <br /> 719971 <br /> OELANEY AND 9At.LY' A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.