Laserfiche WebLink
4.3.5 Residual Funds.In the event that the Mine Site is fully reclaimed <br /> without expending all funds distributed to the MLRB under the Plan, <br /> the balance of such funds shall be used, first, to complete any <br /> distributions owed to Class 9 under the Plan; second, to supplement <br /> the funds reserved for Class 6 claims pursuant to Section 4.4 of the <br /> Plan; and third, to pay Sanwa on account of Sanwa's Class 4 claim. <br /> [Double underlining added.] <br /> 31. In connection with Coal Basin mine property reclamation,Creditors'Trustee <br /> has in cash or credits and for the use and benefit of DMG and/or its reclamation fund,paid <br /> or accrued an aggregate bonding equivalent to the sum of$2,384,112.81. <br /> 32. Defendants believe DMG has unspent monies on hand from property sales <br /> proceeds paid it by or on behalf of Defendants. <br /> 33. Defendants have requested DMG account for Creditors' Trust funds <br /> provided it,state the amount of Creditors'Trust monies on hand,and state what Creditors' <br /> Trust funded reclamation work, if any,remains to be done in Coal Basin. DMG refuses to <br /> either account for Creditors' Trust funds received,for such monies on hand, or state what <br /> such funded reclamation work,if any,remains to be done. <br /> 34. The bankruptcy liquidation PLAN mandates development of a"Reclamation <br /> Plan"and its"schedule"be negotiated among the"Debtor[MCR],the DMG,and the MLRB." <br /> (PLAN§4.3.4.)Despite repeated requests on behalf of MCR,DMG has neglected and refused <br /> to negotiate a "Reclamation Plan" and "schedule" to achieve "completion of principal <br /> reclamation activity at the Mine Site prior to December 1, 1996" as required by the <br /> bankruptcy liquidation PLAN,id. <br /> 35. In furtherance of the bankruptcy liquidation PLAN, several parcels of real <br /> property owned by MCR were sold. Parts of the proceeds from these sales have been paid <br /> to DMG, and parts of sale proceeds have been deposited in an escrow account agreed to <br /> between Plaintiffs and Defendants and held by Stewart Title of Aspen,Inc.,as escrow agent, <br /> in connection with parts of Plaintiffs' unpaid ad valorem taxes all as provided by an"Escrow <br /> Agreement", dated July 30, 1996 (Complaint Exhibit L), amended by an "Amendment to <br /> Escrow Agreement", dated April 29, 1997 (Answer Exhibit 6), and further amended by a <br /> "Second Amendment to Escrow Agreement", dated June 30, 1997 (Answer Exhibit 8). The <br /> principal sums of$462,634.98,$163,609.58 and$9,468.21,respectively,have been deposited <br /> with Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. to be held in accordance with the terms of the "Escrow <br /> Agreement" and its two amendments. <br /> 36. Part of the relief sought by this action is a disposition of escrowed funds(see <br /> e.g.,amended answer,third counterclaim¶ 142). However,it is impossible for this Court to <br /> make a correct distribution of escrowed funds without an accounting by DMG. <br /> CIVIL No.97 cv 131-3 -7- THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT <br />