My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-08-13_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1990-08-13_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2021 8:58:06 AM
Creation date
5/2/2012 11:17:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
8/13/1990
Doc Name
MLRD Order to show cause (07/17/1990)
From
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc.
To
Department of Natural Resources
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fred R. Banta, Director August 10, 1990 <br /> MLRD, Denver, CO 80203 Page 10 <br /> On receiving the NoV, Mid-Continent placed hay bales around <br /> the topsoil pile as a temporary sediment control measure. As noted <br /> in the Justification for Settlement, "No actual damage was <br /> observed. There was a grass buffer zone that essentially treated <br /> the runoff before it hit a clear water diversion. " <br /> The creation of the topsoil pile should, we believe, be <br /> examined in the context of the larger effort then underway which <br /> involved preparation for an expansion of the Sutey refuse pile. <br /> Except for the issue of the hay bales, this large project was <br /> completed successfully with no violations. <br /> During the permitting review for expansion of the Sutey <br /> refuse pile, MLRD raised a number of questions, to which Mid- <br /> Continent responded. However, neither the agency nor Mid-Continent <br /> dealt with temporary or final sediment control measures. This <br /> amounted to an inadvertent permitting oversight that was <br /> immediately corrected without environmental harm. It does not <br /> constitute an unwarranted failure to comply with the law. <br /> CO C-89-019 (29-Jun-89) <br /> Contractor Damage to Outfall 016 Spill-pipe <br /> This Cessation Order was terminated on July 1, 1989. <br /> Civil Penalty (Proposed) <br /> History $100 <br /> Seriousness $1, 250 <br /> Fault $500 <br /> Good Faith -0- <br /> Subtotal $1, 850 <br /> X Two Days = $3,700 (Proposed) <br /> Board Determination <br /> This Cessation Order was the subject matter of a formal <br /> hearing before the Mined Land Reclamation Board. Following the <br /> presentation of Mid-Continent's evidence of the circumstances, the <br /> Board in part ordered, <br /> 2. The civil penalty shall be for one day of <br /> violation rather than two days. The amount <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.