My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1995-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1995-04-14_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2021 7:52:24 PM
Creation date
5/2/2012 10:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/14/1995
Doc Name
Fax Transmission Regarding Review
From
DMG
To
Attorney Generals
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IN <br />1. That C.R.S. S 34- 33- 123(12) is not applicable against <br />the defendants as they were not subject to the May 1991 Board <br />Order and were not agents of Resources after Resources filed <br />bankruptcy; <br />2. That the Schedule was a nullity when implemented due to <br />Resources' bankruptcy; <br />3. That the Board failed to follow proper procedures after <br />revoking Resources' mining permit; <br />4. That the issues in this action are subject to <br />administrative proceedings, and are more properly decided there; <br />5. That the plaintiff failed to join a necessary and <br />indispensable party, Resources; <br />6. That the Division requests relief that cannot be <br />performed; <br />7. That in light of the Division's taking over control of <br />the reclamation, the Division's request for an injunction is moot; <br />8. That the plaintiff's request for a money judgment does <br />not state a present injury, and therefore, this action is not ripe <br />for adjudication; <br />9. That there was no violation of the May 1991 Board Order <br />because the order became moot by the passage of time and changed <br />circumstances; and <br />10. That there was no violation because no valid Board order <br />existed. <br />-8_ <br />0T ' d 99E## WUOT :0T S66T 'VT &113 92E0TPE £OE 1 :01 <br />TUJIT }eu :WONA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.