My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-02-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1994-02-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2021 8:44:41 AM
Creation date
5/1/2012 10:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/2/1994
Doc Name
Mid Continent Resources Response to Board Meeting
From
Office of the Attorney Generals
To
DMG Board Members
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OF CO <br /> 1876 <br /> GALE A. NORTON STATE OF COLORADO STATE SERVICES BUILDING <br /> Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br /> DEPARTMENT OF LAW Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> STEPHEN K. ERKENBRACK Phone (303) 8664500 <br /> Chief Deputy Attorney General OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FAX (303) 866-5691 <br /> TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH <br /> Solicitor General <br /> February 2, 1994 <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> RE: Mid-Continent Resources response to Board meeting <br /> Dear Board Member: <br /> Please find enclosed a letter from Jim Holden, the attorney for <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, which responds to the Board's comments <br /> during its January 26, 1994, meeting. The highlights of the <br /> letter are as follows: <br /> 1. MCR will continue to perform site maintenance as long <br /> as it is in control of the funds; without funds, MCR cannot <br /> perform any necessary maintenance of the site. <br /> 2. MCR has no money to give to the Board for reclamation, <br /> and the agents named in the personal liability suit have no <br /> such money to give to the Board up front. <br /> 3 . The parties named in the personal liability suit will <br /> not guarantee payment of funds required under the liquida- <br /> tion plan. <br /> 4 . MCR is willing to try to get Sanwa to drop its demand <br /> to defer the personal liability suit in exchange for sub- <br /> ordination of its claims. That is, MCR will attempt to get <br /> Sanwa to agree that a stay of the personal liability suit <br /> will not be required as part of the liquidation plan. Jim <br /> Holden would like to know whether the Board and the Divi- <br /> sion would support the plan if distribution was not condi- <br /> tioned on a deferral of the litigation. <br /> 5. MCR is not willing to hand over the deed to the <br /> rockdust plant. MCR feels that because there are numerous <br /> junior liens against this property, a foreclosure action to <br /> determine or extinguish such liens is necessary to make the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.