My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-08-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1994-08-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2021 6:19:00 PM
Creation date
5/1/2012 10:05:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
8/25/1994
Doc Name
Receipt of letter dated 07/28/1994 gratuitous application
From
State of Colorado Department of Law
To
Holden & Jessop, P.C.
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> C <br /> d2 � O <br /> GALE A. NORTON STATE OF COLORADO STATE SERVICES BUILDING <br /> Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br /> DEPARTMENT OF LAW Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> STEPHEN K. ERKENBRACK Phone (303) 866.4500 <br /> Chief Deputy Attorney General OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FAX (303) 866-5691 <br /> TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH <br /> Solicitor General <br /> August 25, 1994 <br /> James B. Holden <br /> Holden & Jessop, P.C. <br /> 303 East 17th Avenue <br /> Suite 930 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203-1264 - <br /> RE: Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> Dear Jim: <br /> I have received your letter of July 28, 1994, in which you raise <br /> concerns about the Division of Minerals and Geology's <br /> "gratuitous" application of the Procurement Code and the ramifi- <br /> cations thereof. <br /> In prior meetings in which the distribution of reclamation funds <br /> was raised, issues pertaining to the Procurement Code were always <br /> left open pending research into the matter. Indeed, the liquida- <br /> tion plan was not confirmed until April 11, 1994, and funds from <br /> the plan were not available until mid-July, 1994 . <br /> In any event, as explained in my July 18, 1994 , letter, the funds <br /> from the liquidation plan are required to be used by the Division <br /> for reclamation. These funds come to the Division only because <br /> the Division is the public agency responsible for enforcing rec- <br /> lamation standards. As such, these funds are public funds and my <br /> client is obligated to follow the requirements of the Procurement <br /> Code. <br /> In a non-bankruptcy situation, the Division revokes an operator's <br /> permit and forfeits the bond. The Division is required to place <br /> funds from the bond in a reclamation account. The Division then <br /> contracts for the acquisition of reclamation work pursuant to the <br /> Procurement Code. These funds are not from taxes or fees, yet <br /> they constitute public funds. Thus, contrary to your letter, the <br /> fact that the reclamation funds are from a liquidation plan ra- <br /> ther than taxes or fees does not mean that the funds are not pub- <br /> lic funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.