My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-07-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1994-07-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2021 10:55:39 AM
Creation date
5/1/2012 10:05:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/28/1994
Doc Name
Confirmation of Resources Chapter 11 plan and receipt sale of a number of assets
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cheryl A. Linden <br /> July 28 , 1994 <br /> Page 3 <br /> be entered into directly by the Division pursuant to the <br /> requirements of the Procurement Code, C.R. S. § 24-101-101 et sea. <br /> Resources has no cash to independently fund any <br /> reclamation contracts, since all cash in now in the possession of <br /> either the Creditors' Trust or the Division. As a result of your <br /> letter, Resources has called off contractors on work which was to <br /> have begun this week. The Division' s new position discards months <br /> of preparation by Resources, and insures that little progress will <br /> be made in the 1994 reclamation season. <br /> At this point, Resources has two preliminary comments <br /> about your letter, and a number of immediate concerns . <br /> Application of the Procurement Code <br /> First, Resources disputes your assertion that the state <br /> Procurement Code applies . C.R.S . § 24-101-105 (1) applies the <br /> Procurement Code to "publicly funded contracts entered into by all <br /> governmental bodies of the executive branch of this state . " As <br /> your letter notes, the Procurement Code does not define "publicly <br /> funded. " Your letter argues that mine reclamation "is for the <br /> benefit of the public" and therefore that the funds being used are <br /> public funds . <br /> Resources contends that a contract is "publicly funded" <br /> when the source of funding is public funds, e .g. , taxes, fees, etc . <br /> In contrast, the reclamation of Resources' mine is being funded <br /> with private funds generated from the liquidation of Resources' <br /> property. <br /> In the case of the Rockdust Plant sales proceeds, the <br /> proceeds were pledged to secure the reclamation bond. In the case <br /> of other liquidation proceeds, the proceeds are made available to <br /> the Division by the terms of the confirmed Chapter 11 Plan. <br /> Specifically, Section 4 . 3 . 2 of the Plan provides that certain net <br /> proceeds from sales of other assets shall be paid to the Mined Land <br /> Reclamation Board (the "MLRB" ) . These funds "shall constitute <br /> forfeited bonds within the meaning of C.R.S . § 34-33-124 (4) , shall <br /> be held by the MLRB, and shall be expended pursuant to Section <br /> 4 . 3 .4 of the Plan. " <br /> C.R. S. § 34-33-124 (4) states that "proceeds of forfeited <br /> bonds shall be available to the division and shall be used by the <br /> division for reclamation of the area covered by the bond. " There <br /> is nothing which indicates that when private funds become <br /> "available" to the Division, such funds become public funds . <br /> Accordingly, Resources believes that the Procurement Code does not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.