My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-01-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-01-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2021 12:41:50 PM
Creation date
5/1/2012 9:46:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
1/15/1993
Doc Name
Reclamation concepts
From
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc.
To
Holden & Jessop. P.C.
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fCuu�i i ✓��n„� �� t� avV i +J LaVd ✓G.. O r JL iG �✓ r VG <br /> MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES <br /> P.O. Bor 1298 <br /> Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 <br /> December 8, 1992 <br /> Jim Holden RE lD <br /> Holden & Jessop, P.C. <br /> Suite 930 JAN 1 51993 <br /> 303 E. 17th Ave. <br /> Denver, CO 80203-1264 <br /> Dear Jim; <br /> John Reeves and I met with the Mined Land Reclamation Division on December 2 to <br /> discuss some reclamation concepts we'd suggested to contain or reduce reclamation <br /> costs for the mine site. <br /> Tony Waldron will send a le-;ter summarizing the Division's view of the meeting, so this <br /> is a report of my own under:.tanding as to their views. <br /> Generally speaking, we discussed means to implement the existing reclamation plan in <br /> the most efficient and cost-effective manner, although there are some changes <br /> proposed. <br /> Portal Sealing <br /> As you know, a plan has been submitted to MSHA concerning the sealing of the <br /> portals. So far, MSHA has neither approved nor rejected the plan. It differs from the <br /> plan approved in the MLRD permit in several respects.' <br /> 1. Sealing the tunnel. <br /> The present plan approved in the reclamation permit calls for installing large <br /> plugs underground al various points in the tunnel with the intention of <br /> preventing future mine drainage. <br /> The plan filed with MSHA calls for constructing a wall of cement blocks across <br /> the entrance and installing a drain in the base. This would be considerably less <br /> The current bond calculations for sealing portals: <br /> Seal 5 portals+tunnel 71,662.12 <br /> Seal 5 fan shafts 23,081.68 <br /> ofal �4.D23.98 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.