My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-02-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-02-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2021 7:53:09 AM
Creation date
5/1/2012 9:46:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/24/1993
Doc Name
Updated letter of January 19th
From
Holden & Jessop, P.C.
To
Fairfield & Woods, P.C, Assist. Attorney Gen. & Winston & Strawn
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stephen W. Seifert <br /> February 24 , 1993 <br /> Page 2 <br /> On February 19, Tietjen sent a letter and enclosures to <br /> Delaney, all of which is enclosed. The "cash equivalency" of <br /> what a surety bond issued by International Casualty Underwriters, <br /> Inc. depends in large part on the credibility of that entity. We <br /> have learned nothing to date which would suggest that we should <br /> accept these bonds. <br /> Among other things, I note that the address of <br /> International Casualty listed on the signature page of the surety <br /> form provided to the Mined Land Reclamation Division is the same <br /> as the address of Alta-Bates, 838 West Clover Meadow Drive, <br /> Murray, Utah. We have found no mention of International Casualty <br /> in any insurance directories. International Casualty is not on <br /> the list of approved sureties published by the U.S. Department of <br /> Treasury, and therefore the MLRD will not accept it as surety. I <br /> further note that the surety bond which supposedly represents a <br /> cash equivalent for the purchase price lists Alta-Bates rather <br /> than Resources as the obligee. <br /> Accordingly, Resources has advised Redstone that the <br /> deposit does not constitute an acceptable cash equivalent, so as <br /> to trigger the Effective Date of the sale agreement which would <br /> cause us to seek Bankruptcy Court approval. Boswell has stated <br /> that he will either work things out with Alta-Bates or utilize an <br /> alternative source of financing in California. My guess is that <br /> Boswell is well-intentioned but lacks a credible source of <br /> financing; I have doubts about whether Alta-Bates is even well- <br /> intentioned. <br /> You will recall that Resources suspended the M&E <br /> contract in accordance with a provision of the M&E contract that <br /> permits Resources to suspend the contract for up to 90 days if a <br /> sale contract is signed to sell the mine to a new operator. <br /> Given the doubtful nature of Redstone's financing, we are <br /> reluctant to continue the suspension of the contract much longer. <br /> Mike Ebert of M&E advises that while the suspension has created <br /> no great problems to date, he ordinarily would expect sales <br /> activity to pick up in the Spring. In particular, he believes he <br /> has a purchaser of the unit train load-out facility for $400, 000, <br /> which Resources believes would be a very good price. <br /> In the very near future, we anticipate one of three <br /> possibilities: (i) Redstone obtains credible financing which will <br /> permit it to escrow cash and will cause us to proceed with the <br /> sale agreement; (ii) Resources terminates the Redstone contract <br /> for failure to provide the required cash escrow; or (iii) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.