My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-10-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-10-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 7:22:24 AM
Creation date
4/30/2012 11:28:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
10/5/1993
Doc Name
Debtor's disclosure statement
From
US District Court
To
Mid-Continent Resources, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the mothball program through the Fall, but thereafter was unable <br /> and unwilling to continue financing the mothball program since it <br /> was clear that Minerals would realize nothing from a sale of the <br /> Mine. <br /> The Debtor filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition in <br /> bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District <br /> of Colorado on February 12 , 1993. Bankruptcy reduced the Debtor's <br /> monthly expenses by suspending catch-up payments to the federal <br /> government on a federal mineral lease, catch-up payments to Public <br /> Service Company on a pre-petition power contract, and payments on <br /> equipment leases and equipment installment purchase contracts. <br /> Additionally, the Debtor believed that bankruptcy would expand the <br /> possibilities for bridge financing of the mothball program pending <br /> sale. Further, the Debtor concluded that if a sale agreement was <br /> not reached, it would be necessary to terminate the mothball <br /> program and commence a program to salvage mine equipment, reclaim <br /> the mine site, and sell the real property for non-mining uses. The <br /> Debtor believed that Chapter 11 presented the best vehicle for <br /> addressing these concerns. <br /> II. DEVELOPMENTS IN CHAPTER 11 CASE <br /> A. Negotiations for Sale of Mine as Operating Facility <br /> As noted in Section I.B. , "The Mining Operation, " on page <br /> above, the Debtor's primary customer in the late 1980 's was <br /> Geneva Steel Corporation ( "Geneva" ) . The Debtor's suspension of <br /> mining operations in January 1991, forced Geneva, located in Utah, <br /> to obtain substitute coal from eastern suppliers. This resulted in <br /> higher costs to Geneva due to higher freight charges. <br /> Geneva was one of the potential purchasers initially <br /> contacted by the Debtor in March 1991, but it did not respond at <br /> that time. Geneva indicated that it was reluctant to become <br /> involved because it considered itself to be a steel producer and <br /> not a coal mine operator. At the same time, Geneva had an obvious <br /> desire that the mine be reopened. <br /> At the end of 1991, after negotiations with A.T. Massey <br /> collapsed and it appeared that the Mine would not be sold to <br /> another coal company, Geneva initiated negotiations to acquire the <br /> Mine. Intensive negotiations resulted in an agreement in principle <br /> to lease and sell the Mine to a newly-created Geneva subsidiary, <br /> Crystal Springs Coal Company. The Debtor and Geneva agreed to a <br /> Terms Sheet (the "Terms Sheet" ) on March 17, 1992. <br /> Pursuant to the Terms Sheet, Crystal Springs funded 75% <br /> of the expenses of mothballing the Mine pending sale of the Mine or <br /> termination of negotiations. These expenses were estimated at <br /> Cs\WP51\JBB\K1DCON\D1SCL06.9TM <br /> October 6, 1993 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.