My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-10-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-10-05_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 7:19:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2012 10:58:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
10/5/1993
Doc Name
Letter Regarding First Amended Plan
From
Hodlen & Jessop PC
To
AGS Office
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 1, 1993 <br /> Page 3 <br /> became concerned that having title in trust would be perceived as <br /> unusual by prospective purchasers and title companies, possibly <br /> chilling sales. Under the Plan as amended, title continues to <br /> nominally reside in the' Debtor. Irrevocable powers of attorney <br /> are granted so that the Creditors' Trustee can pass title without <br /> the involvement of the Debtor. By keeping title in the Debtor, <br /> there also is firmer ground for passing title free and clear of <br /> liens using bankruptcy powers. <br /> There have been some revisions to the cash payments <br /> required on the Effective Date, particularly concerning priority <br /> tax claims. This reflects the fact that sales of equipment have <br /> been slow and the Debtor will not have sufficient cash on the <br /> Effective Date to make all the payments it had hoped to make. <br /> Several changes have been made pertaining to releases, <br /> which are now contained in a new Article VII. Section 7 .4 makes <br /> it clear that, except as provided in Sections 7 .2 and 7 .3, the <br /> Plan does not limit the liability, if any, of third persons with <br /> regard to mine reclamation and environmental remediation. This <br /> is consistent with the earlier plan but has now been made <br /> express. <br /> Section 7 .2 is new, and provides for a release of Sanwa <br /> from the claims of all parties. We felt that if Sanwa is being <br /> asked to "trade down" liquidation proceeds that are subject to <br /> its liens, it should be provided with assurance that it will not <br /> be exposed to litigation. <br /> Section 7.3 (derived from Section 7. 1 in the former <br /> plan) has deleted the requirement that two-thirds of the Class 9 <br /> general creditors accept the Plan. Instead, Section 7.3 now <br /> requires acceptance by a minimum of $10 million of Class 9 <br /> claims. There are about $15 million of Class 9 claims. The <br /> exact amount of the class will be impossible to determine during <br /> the voting period because of the possibility that claims <br /> objections may be filed after confirmation. Moving to a fixed <br /> dollar requirement is intended to remain true to the spirit of <br /> past discussions, while eliminating the difficulty of determining <br /> just when the two-thirds requirement has been satisfied. We are <br /> unlikely to reach $10 million of acceptances without the <br /> acceptance of the Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority <br /> (about $6.9 million) , Public Service (about $1.7 million) , and <br /> the Denver Rio Grande (about $1 million) , so I made the <br /> acceptance by those creditors an express term of the Plan. If <br /> those three creditors accept the Plan, it will not be difficult <br /> to satisfy the $10 million requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.