My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-07-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-07-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2021 5:14:50 PM
Creation date
4/30/2012 10:58:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/30/1993
Doc Name
Plan of liquidation filed 07/02/1993
From
Fairfield and Woods, P.C.
To
Holden & Jessop, P.C.
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FAIRFIELD AND WOODS, PC. <br /> ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW <br /> James Holden <br /> July 30 , 1993 <br /> Page 2 <br /> $1 . 00 per year rent for that equipment . The equipment will surely <br /> depreciate in value over the years of use for reclamation by more <br /> than $1 . 00 per year. Thus, even though the Creditors' Trust will <br /> be able to sell the equipment at the end of the reclamation project <br /> and keep whatever proceeds can be earned on that sale, the net <br /> effect seems to be yet another gratuitous transfer from the <br /> creditors to the MLRD. <br /> While the MLRD may believe that it should win an argument <br /> about the priority of its claim, if the unsecured creditors were to <br /> prevail in such a dispute, the MLRD would be entitled only to its <br /> pro rata share of the Class 9 share of Net Proceeds in the <br /> Creditors' Trust . (If other claims in Class 9 are $15 million, and <br /> the MLRD is owed $3 million, and Net Proceeds equal $5 million, the <br /> MLRD would only receive $191, 167, instead of $1 . 5 million. ) In <br /> other words, the discount, if any, being visited on the MLRD is not <br /> very high in view of its downside risk. Meanwhile, unsecured <br /> creditors are left with only the possibility of receiving 23 cents <br /> of every dollar which qualifies as Net Proceeds, which is not <br /> likely to yield even a 7. 5 cent dividend. The splitting of risks <br /> and burdens is not very equitable. <br /> With those general concerns stated, let me make some specific <br /> comments about language in the documents . First the Plan. <br /> Section 1 . 23 -- should the definition of Net Proceeds also <br /> state that the Net is only after payment of real estate taxes <br /> secured by liens on the property in the Creditors' Trust . I <br /> thought at several points in the Plan and Disclosure Statement that <br /> this concept needed expression in order to avoid any implication <br /> that creditors would be receiving money before the taxing <br /> authorities were paid. <br /> Section 2 . 2 -- "Class 3 " after the title of the Class should <br /> read "Class 2 . " <br /> Section 2 .4 -- Should the definition of the claim in this <br /> Class make it clear that the full amount of the claim, whether or <br /> not secured by property having a value as high as the claim, is in <br /> this Class and that no part of Sanwa' s claim will be allowed in any <br /> other Class? <br /> Section 2 . 5 -- I am not sure that the definition of the claim <br /> is worded broadly enough to cover any and all claims of the MLRB . <br /> Right now the language is limited to a claim arising under the <br /> Reclamation Plan; how about referring also to any claim arising <br /> under any statute, regulation, rule, or doctrine of law or equity <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.