My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-12-09_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-12-09_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2021 10:01:05 AM
Creation date
4/30/2012 10:58:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/9/1993
Doc Name
Proposed Mid-Continent Plan Amendments
From
JIm Holden
To
Mike Long, Steve Renner and Cheryl Linden
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Mike Long, Steve Renner, Cheryl Linden <br /> FROM: Jim Holden <br /> DATE: December 9, 1993 <br /> RE: Proposed Mid-Continent Plan amendments <br /> Procedural background. On November 29, Resources <br /> advised the Bankruptcy Court that neither Sanwa nor the Unsecured <br /> Creditors' Committee would support Plan as presently filed, and <br /> requested time to revise the Plan. <br /> Judge Clark complained about the meagerness of the <br /> distribution to unsecured creditors and the uncertainty of that <br /> distribution. Resources stated that the principal focus of the <br /> case is mine reclamation and that the merits of the case should <br /> be evaluated according to what is distributed on account of all <br /> claims, including reclamation claims. Judge Clark appears not to <br /> be concerned about reclamation claims. <br /> Judge Clark ordered Resources to file an amended plan <br /> and disclosure statement by January 10. If satisfactory changes <br /> cannot be negotiated, the Court must be advised by January 10. <br /> Committee's criticism of Plan as filed: The Plan first <br /> nets out (i) costs of bankruptcy administration, (ii) property <br /> taxes, (iii) sales, severance, and reclamation taxes, (iv) $1.5 <br /> million for reclamation, and (v) $250,000 for other environmental <br /> remediation. The remaining funds then are divided 77% to Sanwa <br /> and 23% to the unsecured creditors. <br /> Assuming Resources' liquidation projections, unsecured <br /> creditors would get about 2 cents on the dollar. If liquidation <br /> projections are not realized, unsecured creditors might get <br /> nothing. <br /> Unsecured creditors complain that the Plan tilts too <br /> far in favor of reclamation claims. The Committee has threatened <br /> to seek Court determination that reclamation claims are general <br /> unsecured claims rather than priority claims. <br /> Unsecured creditors have demanded assurances of a 5% <br /> distribution. There are about $14 million of general unsecured <br /> claims. A 5% distribution on $14 million would require $700,000. <br /> Sanwa's criticism of Plan as filed: The Plan does <br /> nothing to protect corporate affiliates of Resources who have <br /> guaranteed Sanwa's loans. Sanwa is asked to subordinate most of <br /> its lien claims to reclamation and unsecured creditors, without <br /> receiving any assurance that this will buy security for its other <br /> borrowers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.