My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-11-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1992-11-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2021 7:46:33 AM
Creation date
4/30/2012 10:40:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/2/1992
Doc Name
Letter Responding to November 5 Meeting
From
Holden & Jessop PC
To
Assistant Attorney Generals office
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 29, 1992 <br /> Page 3 <br /> The adequacy of the security for reclamation depends to <br /> a large extent on the scope and timing, and the resulting cost, <br /> of the reclamation program. I understand that Diane Delaney is <br /> meeting with the MLRD this week to discuss amendments to the <br /> existing reclamation plan which would better address the timing <br /> and scope of reclamation activities. Diane can fill us in on any <br /> new developments at the November 5 meeting. <br /> Status of Sales <br /> Mike Ebert of Machinery & Equipment Co. reports that he <br /> has made about $250, 000 of sales, using the price list filed <br /> under seal with the Bankruptcy Court. We are about to close the <br /> sale of the 160 acre "pasture tract" for $180,000. In the <br /> meantime, there is a possible alternative to continuing a <br /> piecemeal liquidation of the estate. <br /> As some of you are aware, there has been an on again <br /> and off again discussion with a Utah concern, Northlake <br /> Industries. Northlake has expressed interest in purchasing the <br /> mine, through an apparent subsidiary, Redstone Development <br /> Company, in order to extract oil from coal using proprietary <br /> technology. Last August, Northlake conditioned such purchase on, <br /> among other things, acquisition of all leases (most of which have <br /> been terminated) , real estate (some of which has been sold) , <br /> equipment (some of which has been sold) , and transfer of mining <br /> permits (which have expired or have been revoked) . Resources ' <br /> position has been that a purchase must not be subject to any <br /> conditions which Resources is unable to satisfy. <br /> As of October 26, Northlake claims to have funding for <br /> a $6 million purchase of all of Resources' assets. I am unaware <br /> of any formal acknowledgement by Northlake that it will delete <br /> the above-described conditions, but John Reeves has the <br /> impression that it will. If the sale to Northlake somehow can be <br /> consummated, Northlake has said that it would provide necessary <br /> reclamation bonding with assume all the MLRD/OSM. <br /> I would like some discussion of this situation to see <br /> whether we should be considering suspension of the equipment <br /> liquidation program in favor of a sale to Northlake. Our <br /> contract with M&E permits Resources to terminate the contract <br /> upon the sale of the mine to a new operator as an operating <br /> facility; M&E is then entitled to payment of an upset fee equal <br /> to 13% of their costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.