My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-10-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1992-10-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2021 8:08:03 PM
Creation date
4/30/2012 10:40:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
10/21/1992
Doc Name
Receipt of October 15th letter
From
Holden & Jessop, P.C.
To
Winston & Strawn
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CAM <br /> _ 1 _ I _ J <br /> ( HOLDEN 8C JESSOP, P.C. <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> 303 EAST 171- AVENUE, SUITE 930 <br /> DENVER, COLORADO aO2O3-1264 <br /> (303) 860.7700 <br /> FACSIMILE (303) 960-7233 <br /> October 16, 1992 ; <br /> Neal Wolf <br /> Winston & Strawn <br /> 35 West Wacker Drive <br /> Chicago, IL 60601 <br /> Re: Mid-Continent Resources ( "Resources" ) <br /> Dear Neal: <br /> I have received your letter of October 15 commenting on <br /> the Second Status Report filed in Resources ' Chapter 11 case. I <br /> agree with your statement that Sanwa's "settlement concept" <br /> outlined on June 16 was not an offer insofar as it was <br /> conditioned on approval by Sanwa's senior management. To the <br /> extent that I did not make this clear in the status report, I <br /> apologize. It also is true that the offer or concept was <br /> conditioned on consummation of the Geneva transaction -- I tried <br /> to make this clear in the Status Report when I said that "Sanwa <br /> offered to share with unsecured creditors a portion of the <br /> proceeds from the anticipated Geneva transaction. " <br /> As to your admonition that I should not discuss <br /> settlement negotiations with the Court, I consciously did not <br /> discuss the substance of any settlement offer, but merely <br /> discussed the existence of settlement negotiations, further <br /> noting that "the future of these negotiations is difficult to <br /> predict. " I felt that this was in accordance with the rules of <br /> evidence, but if you disagree I will be more circumspect in the <br /> future. I do not want to chill discussions among the parties or <br /> create concern that statements made in settlement discussions <br /> will be repeated in Court. <br /> I do want to emphasize that Judge Clark has pressed me <br /> on whether the case belongs in bankruptcy in view of the <br /> disparity between the amount of the secured debt and the value of <br /> Resource's assets. This concern of the Court is what led the <br /> Court to order me to file the status report. I need to be able <br /> to point to the existence of negotiations which could produce <br /> some dividend for general creditors, or the case will be at risk <br /> of dismissal. Accordingly, if Sanwa continues to believe that <br /> the problems associated with this mine are best resolved in <br /> Chapter 11, I need to have some ability to advise the Court as to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.