My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-10-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1994-10-25_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2021 9:52:58 PM
Creation date
4/30/2012 10:04:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
10/25/1994
Doc Name
Questions regarding Mid-Continent Resources, Inc.
From
State of Colorado Department of Law
To
James B. Holden
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OF•C0 <br /> 7�01* * <br /> Ig TB <br /> GALE A. NORTON STATE OF COLORADO STATE SERVICES BUILDING <br /> Attorney General 1525 Sherman Street - 5th Floor <br /> DEPARTMENT OF LAW Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> STEPHEN K. ERKENBRACK Phone (303) 866-4500 <br /> Chief Deputy Attorney General OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FAX (303) 866-5691 <br /> TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH <br /> Solicitor General <br /> October 25, 1994 <br /> James B. Holden <br /> 303 East 17th Avenue <br /> Suite 930 <br /> Denver, CO 80203-1264 <br /> RE: Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> Dear Jim: <br /> In recent weeks, I have called you regarding questions I <br /> have about the matter of Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. ; you have <br /> not returned my calls. I am therefore writing this letter <br /> requesting information about the following issues. <br /> Resources' final closing statement for the sale of the real <br /> estate portion of the rockdust plant provides that $3 , 045. 70 were <br /> taken out of the Division's proceeds for county taxes for the <br /> period of January 1, 1994 to August 24 , 1994 . However, the <br /> court-approved contract states that: <br /> . . . Seller shall execute and deliver a good <br /> and sufficient special warranty deed to <br /> Purchaser, on closing, conveying the property <br /> free and clear of all taxes except general <br /> taxes for 1994 payable in 1995 . . . (emphasis <br /> added) . <br /> There appears to be a conflict between payments made <br /> according to the closing statement and payments required to be <br /> made by the contract. The statement indicates that 1994 taxes <br /> were paid up to August 1994 . However, the contract provides that <br /> 1994 taxes were not to be paid out of the proceeds. I would like <br /> a clarification on this issue. If 1994 taxes were not to be paid <br /> as indicated in the contract, then the Division should be given <br /> this money. <br /> In addition to the county tax issue, the closing statement <br /> shows that the amount of $1, 148 . 05 was paid out of the Division's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.