Laserfiche WebLink
run-off and sediment contributions to the Outfall No. 016 tributary <br /> to Coal Creek and the Crystal River. <br /> Part V <br /> Mid-Continent Claims for Relief <br /> First Claim for Relief <br /> Four actual Samples are not <br /> Permit Required nor Permit Appropriate <br /> (First Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> 34. For its first claim for relief, Mid-Continent realleges -the factual allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 33 and <br /> incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> 35. The four dates sampled for TSS from Outfall No. 016 are <br /> neither permit required nor permit appropriate tests and they are <br /> not representative, if at all, of other than the specific dates <br /> tested, that is, January 26, February 2, 7 and 23, 1989. <br /> Second Claim for Relief <br /> Four Actual Samples are Not Representative <br /> (Second Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> 36. For its second claim for relief, Mid-Continent <br /> realleges the factual allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through <br /> 33 and incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> 37. The four dates sampled for TSS from Outfall No. 016 are <br /> neither permit required nor permit appropriate tests and they are <br /> not representative, if at all, of other than the specific dates <br /> tested, that is, January 26, February 2, 7 and 23 , 1989. <br /> Third Claim for Relief <br /> Samples Dates are not Representative <br /> (Third Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> 38. For its third claim for relief, Mid-Continent realleges <br /> the factual allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 33 and <br /> incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> 39. The four sample dates from Outfall No. 016 are not <br /> representative of any 33-day period alleged or otherwise urged as <br /> applicable. <br /> Fourth Claim for Relief <br /> Precipitation Events <br /> (Fourth Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> Complaint - 7 - <br />