My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-07-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1991-07-02_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2021 5:26:47 PM
Creation date
4/30/2012 8:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/2/1991
Doc Name
Civil Action No. 91 CV177 Summons
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
run-off and sediment contributions to the Outfall No. 016 tributary <br /> to Coal Creek and the Crystal River. <br /> Part V <br /> Mid-Continent Claims for Relief <br /> First Claim for Relief <br /> Four actual Samples are not <br /> Permit Required nor Permit Appropriate <br /> (First Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> 34. For its first claim for relief, Mid-Continent realleges -the factual allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 33 and <br /> incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> 35. The four dates sampled for TSS from Outfall No. 016 are <br /> neither permit required nor permit appropriate tests and they are <br /> not representative, if at all, of other than the specific dates <br /> tested, that is, January 26, February 2, 7 and 23, 1989. <br /> Second Claim for Relief <br /> Four Actual Samples are Not Representative <br /> (Second Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> 36. For its second claim for relief, Mid-Continent <br /> realleges the factual allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through <br /> 33 and incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> 37. The four dates sampled for TSS from Outfall No. 016 are <br /> neither permit required nor permit appropriate tests and they are <br /> not representative, if at all, of other than the specific dates <br /> tested, that is, January 26, February 2, 7 and 23 , 1989. <br /> Third Claim for Relief <br /> Samples Dates are not Representative <br /> (Third Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> 38. For its third claim for relief, Mid-Continent realleges <br /> the factual allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 33 and <br /> incorporated herein by this reference. <br /> 39. The four sample dates from Outfall No. 016 are not <br /> representative of any 33-day period alleged or otherwise urged as <br /> applicable. <br /> Fourth Claim for Relief <br /> Precipitation Events <br /> (Fourth Affirmative Defense to WQCD Charges) <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> Complaint - 7 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.