Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> requirements . <br /> Interrogator No. 26. Are the civil penalty criteria <br /> referred to hereinabove in Interrogatories Nos . 19 and 20 <br /> derived from or related to the Federal Clean Water Act , the <br /> Colorado Water Quality Control Act , and/or Environmental Policy <br /> Agency Civil Penalty policy, including but not necessary <br /> limited to [Federal Laws ] Env ' t Rep (BNA) § 41 :2991 (June 1 , <br /> 1984)? If so, please explain how they are derived or related. <br /> Interrogatory No. 27 . What has been the practice of the <br /> Division or WQCD in determining the number of days of violation <br /> in assessing civil penalties as part of enforcement actions <br /> taken against industrial or private sector permittees during <br /> the past five years? <br /> Interrogatory No. 28. Please explain the civil penalty <br /> criteria and how the days of violation have been determined in <br /> the civil penalties assessed against other private sector <br /> permittees during the past five years , including but not <br /> limited to: <br /> (a) Colorado Yampa Coal Co. , Permit CO-0027154, <br /> (b) Wyoming Fuels, Permit CO-0033367, <br /> ( c) Western Sugar Co. , Permit CO-0041360, <br /> (d) Martin Marietta, Permit CO-001511 , <br /> (e) Public Service Co. , Permit CO-0001104, and <br /> ( f) Apple Drilling (No permit) . <br /> DATED this 13th day of October , 1989 . <br /> DELANEY & BALCOMB, P.C. <br /> Attor at Law <br /> By IL-A-4t <br /> Edward Mulhall, Jr. <br /> Registration No. 1374 <br /> Attorneys for Permittee , <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> P. 0. Drawer 790 <br /> 818 Colorado Avenue <br /> Glenwood Springs , CO 81602 <br /> 303/945-6546 <br /> MCR Interrogs to DoH/WQCD - 6 - <br />