My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1994-07-01_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2021 8:31:38 PM
Creation date
4/30/2012 8:58:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
7/1/1994
Doc Name
Plaintiff/Defendants- Appellants
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Continent with discharges from Outfall 016 that violated the <br /> concentration limitations for three different pollutants: iron, <br /> oil and grease, and total suspended solids. <br /> The Mined Land Reclamation Division notice alleged that Mid- <br /> Continent had failed to maintain adequate water treatment <br /> facilities, sediment control measures, and three specific <br /> sediment ponds that resulted in discharges from Outfall 016 which <br /> failed to meet applicable state regulations and permit <br /> limitations. <br /> Mid-Continent entered into a settlement agreement with Mined <br /> Land Reclamation Division to resolve the violation of that <br /> permit. The agreement established the dollar amount of a fine <br /> for the violation and the time for payment. Thereafter and in <br /> response to the alleged violation of the Water Quality Control <br /> Division permit, Mid-Continent asserted, among other things, that <br /> proceedings to establish a violation of this permit were barred <br /> by the doctrine of res judicata. <br /> The hearing officer found that Mid-Continent had violated <br /> the terms of the permit and rejected plaintiff's res judicata <br /> defense. Specifically, the officer found that Mid-Continent' s <br /> discharge of iron effluent exceeded the permit limitation on two <br /> specific days, that the discharge of oil and grease exceeded the <br /> permit limitation on one day, and that the discharge of suspended <br /> solids exceeded the permit limitation for a period of 29 <br /> consecutive days. These findings were affirmed by the Executive <br /> Director of the Colorado Department of Health. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.