Laserfiche WebLink
Pitch Reclamation Project Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board — 2011 Annual Reclamation Report <br />early June and stable flows of less than 10 gallons per minute (gpm) throughout the year. The measured <br />peak flow for the 2011 season was 28.5 gpm on June 15, 2011. This was consistent with the peak <br />discharge in 2009 of 29.2 gpm and 22.6 gpm in 2010 and consistent with higher snow packs at the site <br />since 2005. A hydrograph of the Pinnacle Adit flow at PP -01 is provided as Figure 5. The spike in flows <br />observed at PP -01 each spring are likely a result of snowmelt and runoff from surrounding sources <br />originating between the Pinnacle plug and the PP -01 monitoring point. Once the snowmelt period is over, <br />the flow rate at PP -01 decreases and stabilizes at normal levels. <br />4.3.4 Radium and Uranium Concentrations at PP -01 <br />Dissolved radium 226 and total uranium have been monitored at PP -01 since March 1994. After <br />construction of the Pinnacle Adit plug in September 1995, both the dissolved radium 226 and total <br />uranium concentrations have stabilized at reduced concentrations. A graph of the radium and uranium <br />concentrations at PP -01 is provided as Figure 6. During 2011, total uranium and dissolved radium 226 <br />levels remained at the reduced concentrations observed over the preceding fifteen -year period. <br />4.4 Sediment Control Embankment <br />The safety and efficiency of the sediment embankment is monitored with a network of surface and <br />subsurface systems. There are five permanent survey monuments where any physical movement of the <br />embankment can be measured and nine piezometers have been installed to monitor the phreatic surface <br />within the embankment. Five of the piezometers were installed during the initial construction in 1980, and <br />four of the piezometers were completed in the core of the embankment in 2001. The 2011 monument <br />survey was performed on September 24 and results indicate the amount of vertical movement is minimal <br />and within the range of survey instrument error. No significant vertical displacement has occurred since <br />the initial settlement following construction. <br />In 2011, the highest water level in the pond of 9890.0 amsl occurred on June1 and dropped back down to <br />the 9884.0 elevation by June 27 and remained at the level through the rest of the year. As a result, the <br />water levels in the piezometers showed little response to water stored in the impoundment in 2011. <br />In 2011, the water level in Piezometer P1 in the upstream face of the embankment rose by 12.90 feet <br />compared with 15.45 feet in 2009 when the pond level reached 9891.0 amsl. In response to the higher <br />water levels in the pond since 2005, the maximum water level in Piezometer P3 increased from 9863.56 <br />to 9866.02ft. amsl, representing a rise of 2.46 feet. The water level in P3 increased by 3.61 feet in mid <br />June and dropped back to the normal ranged by the end of summer. In contrast, from 2004 through <br />2010, the maximum water level in Piezometer P4 decreased from 9831.1 to 9829.3 ft. amsl, a drop of 1.8 <br />feet. In 2011, the water level in P4 increased by 1.52 feet. <br />Because P4 is in close proximity to the seepage area noted in 2000, it is monitored closely. Over the <br />previous five years it was observed that the water level in P4 was not falling back as rapidly as the other <br />piezometers. It was noted that when the probe was pulled out of the P4 and P5 they were covered with <br />silt. The silt build up didn't allow the pipes to drain sufficiently to show the phreatic surface in the <br />embankment. In an attempt to remedy the problem, in July 2009 both piezometers P4 and P5 were <br />flushed with high - pressure water in an attempt to minimize the silt and other debris that had built up in the <br />standpipes. The high pressure flushing resulted in the water levels in both piezometers falling back to <br />normal levels within a few days in 2009, with the average water level in P4 dropping by more than 3 feet. <br />Piezometer P5 also fell back rapidly after being flushed. In 2010, the maximum water elevation in P5 was <br />2.46 feet, below the maximum elevation of 6.7 feet in 2009. The 2011 maximum water levels in the <br />embankment piezometers P6, P8 and P9 also decreased from levels over the past four years. Only P6 <br />Pitch 2011 Reclamation Finalreport 19Apr12.Doc <br />15 <br />