Laserfiche WebLink
Additionally, the Geotechnical Reconnaissance Report concluded that the road could be used for the <br />purposes intended as long as the following recommendations were met: <br />• The upper 30 inches of road should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction per <br />ASTM D1557 -02. <br />• In areas where less than 30 inches of fill will be placed to complete the road, over - excavate, <br />scarify to a depth of 6 inches, moisture condition and compact to at least 95% relative <br />compaction per ASTM D1557 -02. <br />• Construct new fill slopes no steeper than 1.5:1 and, if this could not be achieved, the use of <br />retaining walls will be required. Cut slopes could be constructed as steep as 3 /4:1 if they were <br />horizontally reinforced. <br />• Repair or reconstruct the retaining walls along the down slope side of the road. <br />Finally, the Geotechnical Reconnaissance Report recommended that a monitoring program be <br />implemented to measure the movement (if any) of key access road locations and retaining wall <br />components. The monitoring points would consist of surface monuments and inclinometers located <br />at key locations as designated by the Geotechnical Engineer. <br />Scope of Work <br />Construction documents have been prepared showing the scope of work and detailing the <br />construction required to bring the New Access Road into compliance with DRMS requirements (see <br />Appendix A). The road will be re- graded from County Road 124 to the La Plata River to meet the <br />requirements of the Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report, prepared by J. Erich Rauber and David <br />McLay and dated April 2, 2012. The Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report supersedes the <br />Geotechnical Reconnaissance Investigation performed in May 2010 and is included in Appendix B. <br />The New Access Road will have a typical section of a 12 -foot wide drivable surface with a 1 -foot <br />deep roadside swale for drainage run -off and a 1 -foot bench along the edge of the road opposite the <br />swale. The roadside swale will have 2:1 (maximum) side slopes for a typical roadway width of 17 <br />feet. Six inches of gravel will be placed on the drivable portion of the road to provide an all- weather <br />surface for vehicular traffic. A typical section (sheet C2.00) has been shown in the Construction <br />Drawings detailing the dimensions, depth of gravel and roadway compaction requirements. <br />The drainage ditch will convey stormwater run -off to a low point at approximately the midpoint of the <br />reconstructed portion of the road, where it will be captured, detained and released down slope. <br />Wildcat is proposing that run -off be detained and settled, through the use of a three -stage outlet <br />structure before it is released to protect the water quality of the river and wetlands that have been <br />identified near the detention pond outfall. Detailed calculations for the drainage run -off, depth of <br />stormwater run -off in the swale and the three -stage outlet structure can be found in Appendix C. <br />The existing timber retaining walls will be removed and hauled off -site to be disposed of properly. In <br />order to maintain the slopes recommended in the Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report, a retaining <br />wall will be constructed on the down slope side of the proposed road. The proposed retaining wall <br />will be a single mechanically stabilized (MSE) wall with a maximum height of 10 feet. This wall will <br />transition to a concrete headwall needed for the detention pond outlet pipe. The headwall will be <br />constructed to meet CDOT standards and specifications and will have a maximum height of 12 feet. <br />The Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report recommends that the retaining wall should bear on <br />bedrock. To accommodate this recommendation, the top of the retaining wall will be placed 10 feet <br />from centerline of road to allow room for installation of a guardrail, but still have a foundation that is <br />placed on bedrock. The 10 foot dimension from centerline also allows for a typical batter of the wall <br />without reducing the typical section of the road. Details for the retaining wall are provided in the <br />construction documents found in Appendix A. <br />Page 4 <br />