My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-04-10_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2012-04-10_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:05:27 PM
Creation date
4/24/2012 4:06:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/10/2012
Doc Name
TECHNICAL REVISION (TR02)
From
WILDCAT MINING CORP.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR2
Email Name
DMC
SSS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(approximately 72 tons per vehicle) for vehicles with solid rubber or cushioned wheels. The <br />40 -ton vehicle load used by Wildcat for their analysis is below the County's maximum weight <br />limit standards. <br />• A blasting plan, if required by the revised design. <br />The Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report did not indicate that blasting would be necessary <br />to grade the New Access Road, so no blasting plan has been prepared for the construction <br />of the New Access Road. <br />• Out slope fill material removal and retaining structure construction method, including cross - <br />sections and conceptual drawings for the methods. <br />A section for the retaining structure showing typical footing, backfill material and tie backs <br />and how they relate to the proposed road improvements can be found on sheet C4.91. Exact <br />dimensions of the wall footing, depths of select fill behind the wall and lengths of tie backs <br />will be provided by a structural engineer prior to the start of construction. <br />• Stability of previously placed fill material and native material at the previously constructed out <br />slope. <br />Stability of previously placed fill material is discussed in Section 3.4 — Stability Analysis of the <br />Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report. <br />• Determine if previously placed fill material and native material is stable for purposes of fill <br />placement. <br />A discussion of the previously placed fill material can be found in Section 3.4 — Stability <br />Analysis of the Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report. <br />• Determine if excavation will continue until bedrock is exposed to provide subgrade for fill <br />placement. <br />The Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report recommends to excavate previously placed fill <br />material or 30- inches of overexcavation in Section 5.2 — Roadway Grading. <br />• A method for the removal of the existing timber cribbing retaining wall. <br />The existing timber cribbing retaining wall is called out in the Construction Drawings to be <br />removed. The exact means and methods of this removal is the Contractor's responsibility. <br />There is a general note on the Plan and Profile sheets stating that the Contractor is to remain <br />within the Affected Mine Area Boundary and outside of the wetlands during all construction <br />activities. <br />• Construction of the new retaining wall (Gabion) structures. <br />The Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report calls for a single mechanically stabilized earth <br />(MSE) wall in Section 5.3 — Retaining Walls. Sheet C4.91 shows details of this retaining wall <br />as well as a typical section of the retaining wall detailing standard construction of an MSE <br />wall. Exact details for the wall will need to be completed by a structural engineer prior to the <br />start of construction. <br />• A method and standards for the placement and compaction of the new out slope fill. <br />The method and standard for the placement and compaction is discussed in Section 5.2 — <br />Roadway Grading of the Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Report. <br />• Modifications to the proposed maximum lift thickness including clarification if the proposed <br />thicknesses are standards for loose or compacted lifts. <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.