My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980-06-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1980-06-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 1:58:08 PM
Creation date
4/23/2012 12:47:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/11/1980
Doc Name
Wildlife Baseline Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 11 Addendum 11-1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vegetation distribution (no habitat affinities) , then the proportion of <br /> individuals of a species encountered in a particular vegetation type would <br /> correspond to the proportion of the sampling effort devoted to th^a-t <br /> vegetation type. For example if 30% of the small manmal live traps were <br /> established in upland sagebrush, then 30% of the total number of individuals <br /> of all species captured over all sampling transects would have been caught <br /> in the upland sagebrush habitat if the species were distributed randomly. <br /> Conversely, if 90% of all Peromyscus maniculatus (deer muse) captures <br /> occurred in the upland sagebrush type, this would indicate a definite <br /> affinity of P. maniculatus for the upland sagebrush vegetation type. <br /> The Chi-square test (Snedecor and Cochran 1967) was used to detexmine <br /> if the differences between the observed number of captures for a given <br /> species in a given vegetation type and the number of captures expected on <br /> the basis of a random distribution was significant. The Chi-square <br /> statistic, X2, is given by: <br /> X2= iE 1 <br /> where: <br /> Oi = observed number of captures (or encounters) for habitat i <br /> Ei = expected number of captures in habitat i based on a random <br /> distribution among habitats. <br /> The calculated Chi-square value was compared to a Chi-square table to determine <br /> if a significant difference between observed and expected number of captures <br /> occurred at the 95% confidence level. If a significant difference did exist, <br /> individuai Chi-square values for individual habitats were examined to provide <br /> an indication of those habitats for which a species shows an affinity or an <br /> avoidance. <br /> -i5- <br /> J U N 1 1 1980 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.