Laserfiche WebLink
Despite these seasonal fluctuations and despite the fact that <br /> this site is located downgradient of mining, the quality of <br /> water at this site has remained essentially unchanged with <br /> respect to all of the reported parameters including TDS (see <br /> Table 3) since monitoring began in October 1979. Comparison of the <br /> 1980-81 data, to the 1985-86 data presented in Table 8 substantiates <br /> this conclusion. Table 9 which compares October 1979 data with <br /> that of October 1985 data also substantiates this -conclusion. In <br /> fact, even though flow was substantially lower in 1985, 618 gpm in <br /> 1985 versus 1346 gpm in 1979, TDS concentration was actually <br /> slightly lower in 1985 than in 1979. <br /> With respect to Colorado Department of Health (DOH) receiving <br /> stream standards (DOH, 1983) , Tuttle Draw lies within Stream <br /> Segment 12 of Region 10 of the San Miguel River (see Table 10). <br /> Stream Segment 12 is defined as follows: <br /> All tributaries to the San Miguel River from a point - <br /> immediately below the confluence of Leopard Creek to <br /> the Dolores River with the exceptions listed in <br /> Segments 9, 10 and 11. <br /> The listed exceptions do not apply to Tuttle Draw. As a <br /> result, the numeric standards which apply to this segment are <br /> those which only pertain to the physical and biological <br /> parameters. Specifically, these standards are dissolved oxygen <br /> (DO) , pH and fecal ccliform with limits of 5.0 mg/l , 6.5-9.0 <br /> units, and 2000/100 ml , respectively. Fecal coliform and DO <br /> are not analyzed as part of the approved monitoring program and <br /> PH values have always ranged between 7.4 and 8.2 for the period <br /> of record. <br /> Besides receiving stream standards, the DOH has recently <br /> drafted a set of water quality standards for the purpose of <br /> protecting ground water quality with respect to agricultural <br /> use (DOH, 1986; Table 11) . Although these ground water standards <br /> have not yet been approved by the DOH, they will be used in this <br /> 29 <br />