Laserfiche WebLink
outside these multiple year ranges will be considered to be possible effects from pit <br /> pumpage. Water level drops in monitoring wells outside the projected zones of pit pumpage <br /> drawdown will be considered suspect unless a consistent deepening trend develops. <br /> Mining impacts on ground water quality will be compared against the multiple year baseline <br /> monitoring ranges established for each chemical parameter monitored at each site. Because <br /> a number of variables can affect water chemistry, only significant increases or consistent <br /> trends will be considered as possible impacts from mining. Trilinear and Schoeller <br /> diagram plots of well water chemistry will also be evaluated to identify water quality <br /> changes or degradation trends. <br /> Spring Flows and Quality. Spring flows and quality changes at spring monitoring sites <br /> will be compared to ranges developed from multiple-year baseline monitoring data. <br /> Significant flow or quality deviations from the multiple-year ranges not explainable by <br /> climatic fluctuations will be considered to suggest impacts from mining. <br /> Surface Water Monitoring Plan. <br /> Introduction. Determinations of the probable hydrologic consequences (PHC) of mining have <br /> been made by including detailed analyses of historical surface water quality data (see Tab <br /> 17, Probable Hydrologic Consequences). Table 18-1 presents the surface water sites used <br /> to substantiate the significance findings presented in the PHC analysis and for measuring <br /> potential future mining impacts. The following section summarizes how future mining <br /> impacts on both surface water quality and quantity will be evaluated using monitoring data <br /> collected at sites established in both the Nucla Mine and Nucla East mining areas. <br /> Surface Water Quality. Future impacts on surface water quality will be evaluated by using <br /> trending analyses. Mining activities at the Nucla Mine began prior to the onset of <br /> collecting surface water quality data (1979), hence, no true baseline data exists for <br /> comparison purposes. However, a well documented but short record of surface water quality <br /> has been collected during baseline studies conducted at the Nucla East area. Regardless, <br /> the significance of impacts will be evaluated by analyzing for prominent trends of <br /> changing chemical concentrations over time. Consistently increasing concentrations of <br /> chemical parameters will be considered to suggest mining impacts. Data collected at sites <br /> located above mining (most upstream) along Tuttle (SW-N1) and Calamity Draws (proposed <br /> surface water monitoring site, see Tab 15, Hydrologic Monitoring Program) will be used for <br /> investigating whether any future observed trends are natural or result from mining. <br /> 18-6 Revised 04/11/88 <br />