My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-11_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:09:42 PM
Creation date
4/19/2012 10:23:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/11/1988
Doc Name
Probable Hydrologic Consequences
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 17
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nucla East Water Quality Data. Two monitoring wells, both completed in the lower <br /> Dakota coal, yield water samples with pH's lower than 5.0. GW-N14 has produced samples <br /> with pH's of 5.05, 6.47, 5.80, 4.90 and, 4.91. <br /> The sample with a pH of 4.90 had a cadmium concentration of 10 ug/l (the Drinking Water <br /> Standard). No other Primary Standards were met or exceeded. The cadmium concentration <br /> may not be a function of pH, however. Well GW-N15, which samples the overburden at this <br /> site, has a neutral pH and higher cadmium concentrations. The arsenic concentration in <br /> the same sample was 8 ug/l, and the arsenic concentration in the 4.91 pH sample was 1 ug/l <br /> (the detection limit). The Primary Drinking Water Standard is 50 ug/l . No other samples <br /> had detectable arsenic. <br /> The other well with low pH water is GW-N20, also completed in the coal . Through time, the <br /> pH of its water has been 4.68, 4.95, 5.522 5.82, and 5.65. Only the first sample had <br /> detectable arsenic (4.0 ug/1) and lead (70 ug/1). The lead data are very suspect (Wells <br /> GW-N13, GW-N14, GW-N18, GW-N20, GW-N21, and GW-N22 had reported lead concentrations <br /> ranging from 40 to 80 ug/l for samples collected in July 1986). No other samples from any <br /> of these wells have had detectable lead. Sample contamination or laboratory problems may <br /> have occurred. Of interest in the GW-N20 samples is the increase in sample pH through <br /> time. This well has a higher yield than GW-N14 does. The increase in pH (and <br /> coincidental decrease in sulfate and many other parameters) suggest that the low pH water <br /> in the coal has been removed during sampling and has been replaced by other nearby water. <br /> The rate of acid production is not rapid enough to maintain pH's less than 5.0. <br /> 'cable 17-9 summarizes the available data on pH of water samples from the Nucla East area, <br /> as a function of stratigraphy. Twenty percent of the measurements were less than pH 6. <br /> All of the low pH readings are for samples collected from the Dakota coal; presumably any <br /> problems associated with the coal will decrease when it is mined. Monitoring wells which <br /> sample the interburden also sample the overburden so that it is not possible to determine <br /> the quality of the interburden water, especially from the upper and lower interbeds. <br /> However, no samples with pH less than 6.0 have been collected from these wells. Presuming <br /> that acidic water is present, mixing easily neutralizes the acid. <br /> Mixing of acidic water from GW-N20 (coal) and neutral water from GW-N21 (overburden) was <br /> investigated using PHREEQE. The results can be easily summarized. If no minerals (such <br /> as calcite) are (theoretically) allowed to dissolve or precipitate, a mixture of 80 <br /> 17-42 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.