My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:47:19 PM
Creation date
4/19/2012 8:40:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/18/1988
Doc Name
Sedimentation Pond 007
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment G
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and again during the reclamation period. <br /> The pond was conservatively designed with the assumption the pond was 100 percent full to <br /> the principal spillway during the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event and no discharge <br /> was allowed through the emergency spillway. The principal spillway was sized to allow <br /> adequate detention time to allow 100 percent basin trap efficiency. In addition, the <br /> design conservatively assumed the pond was 100 percent full to the emergency spillway <br /> during the 25-year and 100-year, 24-hour precipitation events and adequate freeboard will <br /> be maintained to prevent overtopping of the embankment. <br /> SCS Curve Numbers and "k" Factor. SCS curve numbers were estimated for the watershed <br /> based on the cover type, percent vegetation cover, hydrologic conditions, and hydrologic <br /> soil type. Several sources were used to obtain this data: <br /> 1. Cover Type - Aerial photographs of the mine site were used to identify the <br /> existing cover type. Maps delineating the proposed mining plan were used to <br /> identify areas that will be disturbed by mining. Three general categories of <br /> cover type were used: undisturbed, disturbed, and reclaimed. Further <br /> subclassifications were made in each category as shown in Table 2. <br /> The cover type and drainage area for some structures will vary throughout the <br /> life of the structure as mining and subsequent reclamation occurs. For these <br /> cases, the anticipated worst conditions are assumed for the hydrologic analysis. <br /> 2. Percent Vegetation Cover - The percent of ground surface covered by vegetation <br /> in undisturbed areas was estimated from field inspections and aerial <br /> photographs. <br /> 3. Hydrologic Condition - The hydrologic condition was directly related to the <br /> percent vegetation cover as shown in Table 2. <br /> 4. Hydrologic Soil Type - Soil survey maps, as contained in Tab 9 of the current <br /> mine permit, provides the basis of determining the hydrologic soil type and the <br /> soil erodibility factor, "k" factor (see Tables 2 and 3). <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.