My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-04-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-04-18_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2021 12:49:57 PM
Creation date
4/19/2012 8:37:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/18/1988
Doc Name
Sedimentation Pond 006
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment F
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In some instances, the mining will cause the drainage area to change <br /> during the life of the sediment structure. When the pit moves into the <br /> watershed, runoff will be intercepted by the pit and diverted away from <br /> the structure. In these cases, a conservative procedure was used; the <br /> structure was analyzed for the largest anticipated drainage area that <br /> will contribute runoff to the structure. This condition usually occurs <br /> at the start of mining and again during the reclamation period. <br /> SCS Curve Numbers <br /> SCS curve numbers were estimated for each subwatershed based on the <br /> cover type, percent vegetation cover, hydrologic conditions, and <br /> hydrologic soil type. Several sources were used to obtain this data: <br /> 1. Cover Type - Aerial photographs of the mine site were used to <br /> identify the existing cover type. Maps delineating the <br /> proposed mining plan were used to identify areas that will be <br /> disturbed by mining. Three general categories of cover type <br /> were used: undisturbed, disturbed, and reclaimed. Further <br /> sub-classifications were made in each category as shown in <br /> Table 2. <br /> The cover type (and the tributary drainage area) for some <br /> structures will vary throughout the life of the structure as <br /> mining and subsequent reclamation occurs. For these cases, <br /> the anticipated worst condition is assumed for the hydrologic <br /> analysis. Usually the worst condition is the maximum <br /> disturbed area at the end of the mining activity and just <br /> propr to the start of land reclamation. <br /> 2. Percent Vegetation Cover - The percent of ground surface <br /> covered by vegetation in undisturbed areas was estimated from <br /> field inspections and aerial photographs. <br /> 3. Hydrologic Condition - The hydrologic condition was directly <br /> related to the percent vegetation cover as shown in Table 2. <br /> 4. Hydrologic Soil Type - Soil survey maps, as contained in Tab 9 <br /> of the current Mine Plan, provides the basis of determining <br /> the hydrologic soil type and soil erodibility factor, "k" <br /> factor (see Table 3) . <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.